melscott62
All-Conference
TO taking the AD position is not a good sign. I'm not saying its a sure thing by any means, but I cant see how this would not help Gills chances.
Last edited by a moderator:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
for those of you in the no Gill party
- Thread starter melscott62
- Start date
mjmartin1970
Special Teams Player
I really don't think that TO as AD guarantees anyone being HC. IMHO all it does is that a fair evaluation of what is going on will happen, and if changes are required, then the best person for the job will be found (not just a name or former NFL HC).
melscott62
All-Conference
I really don't think that TO as AD guarantees anyone being HC. IMHO all it does is that a fair evaluation of what is going on will happen, and if changes are required, then the best person for the job will be found (not just a name or former NFL HC).
thats pretty much what I just said. however if you dont think being a former player, coach and close friend to TO doesnt help, your lost. lets say it ends up a situation like last time and there are no clear cut choices and we are left with people who are not very experienced, or have no experience as a HC. Gill connection to TO would be huge.
mjmartin1970
Special Teams Player
thats pretty much what I just said. however if you dont think being a former player, coach and close friend to TO doesnt help, your lost. lets say it ends up a situation like last time and there are no clear cut choices and we are left with people who are not very experienced, or have no experience as a HC. Gill connection to TO would be huge.
I do have to agree with that.
I do have to agree with that.