toothlessHusker
Banned
Here's Buffalo's wins dating back to 2001, with Turner's two seasons in red.
2001: 2
2002: 1
2003: 1
2004: 2
2005: 1
2006: 2
2007: 5
He won 5 games, had 7 losses. The 7 losses were by 14, 8, 35, 13, 21, 35.
That's a lot of games that weren't even competitive.
Looks like a lot of progress for Buffalo, and 5-7 is a great season for them by their standards. But is this the very best Nebraska can do? It just seems like a gamble to the extreme. Everyone says "yeah but Buffalo sucks so 5 wins is remarkable". So we're going to pick our next coach because he's put together a few wins in two years at a crappy program? I mean even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut. I don't see how any logically thinking person can come to the conclusion that Turner is our best option at this point. How do you make that case?
I will support TO no matter who he hires, but Turner Gill potentially places this program at the cusp of permanent irrelevance.
2001: 2
2002: 1
2003: 1
2004: 2
2005: 1
2006: 2
2007: 5
He won 5 games, had 7 losses. The 7 losses were by 14, 8, 35, 13, 21, 35.
That's a lot of games that weren't even competitive.
Looks like a lot of progress for Buffalo, and 5-7 is a great season for them by their standards. But is this the very best Nebraska can do? It just seems like a gamble to the extreme. Everyone says "yeah but Buffalo sucks so 5 wins is remarkable". So we're going to pick our next coach because he's put together a few wins in two years at a crappy program? I mean even a blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut. I don't see how any logically thinking person can come to the conclusion that Turner is our best option at this point. How do you make that case?
I will support TO no matter who he hires, but Turner Gill potentially places this program at the cusp of permanent irrelevance.
Last edited by a moderator: