Seems to me, given the disparity of fouls of 16 to 2 in the TAM game, consideration of methods "the brass" of the Big 12 might use to assure the results they want for football games involving NU are in order.
As a start, it is my assumption that making sure a certain team loses is not illegal. Given the right frame of mind, such action might not even be thought of as unethical if one were sufficiently incensed at NU's imminent departure from the league. It would seem to be unethical give what we all understand to be fair play.
It would seem important to not leave a trail so whatever would be done in the way of "suggesting" to a team of officials would not be done in writing and emails would be unwise. Given the tendency of folks involved in shenanigans to boast, the number of folks in on the deal would need to be kept to a minimum. What would be said, to whom, and when?
D
As a start, it is my assumption that making sure a certain team loses is not illegal. Given the right frame of mind, such action might not even be thought of as unethical if one were sufficiently incensed at NU's imminent departure from the league. It would seem to be unethical give what we all understand to be fair play.
It would seem important to not leave a trail so whatever would be done in the way of "suggesting" to a team of officials would not be done in writing and emails would be unwise. Given the tendency of folks involved in shenanigans to boast, the number of folks in on the deal would need to be kept to a minimum. What would be said, to whom, and when?
D