I don't agree with some of what has been said so here is my rant.
I can understand why some would be upset over the game, I mean we lost. And with any Husker loss, people must expect fans to take it hard, and react with varying manners of temperament. This being said, there is a level in which some achieve the rediculous. Some have achieved this through the "wanting the head of Callahan", others can achieve this through putting Callahan on a pedastel by exclaiming him beyond criticism. Either side, in reference to solely this game, is a little extreme. Hopefully, those who wanted BC's head for this were just "in the moment" , pissed, and over-reacted. On the other hand, I think it is unfair for people to exclaim these people as "anti-husker" or "fairweather fans". If you do, does this mean one cannot be critical with or upset with BC without be deemed "anti-husker"? I disagree with my wife a lot of time, it does not mean that I love her any less. I was not real impressed with BC's game plan. I do think BC played it safe and conservative. If anyone thinks he did not, I would like to hear your reasonings. Do I suoport BC any less now than I did last week, NO! Isn't crazy how one can be critical of and still care?