Is losing Suh a big deal?

[schuhbdoo]

she is a writer/reporter and radio personality according to her own twitter page...

ive highlighted the only background info i needed, which disturbingly piqued my interest and sent me careening throughout the web to dig up this gem courtesy of her bleacherreport profile...

ive seen all i need to ever know about a certain Lisa Horne thanks to this thread. she looks like she might spend some of her research time eating footballs.

"that's a man, baby!!!!!!!!!! Gotta love michael myers references.

She doesn't know Bo. Crick is already being touted as being as good. I will call it right now and say we go back to back on scoring defense titles. UNC will be good. BSU will be good. Texas will be good. OU will be good but Nebraska repeats as the scoring d champs in 2010.

 

[I See Red People]

:WTH Losing Suh is not like losing an All-American D-line. Not even close. It will be a loss, yes. However, IN NO WAY was Suh the ENTIRE defense. That is a slap in the face to guys like Crick, O'Hanlon, Dillard, Asante, Allen, etc. Even Suh would strongly disagree methinks.

 

[walksalone]

Boy, she's f'n dumb...

Bob Stoops loses two of his three major impact players on offense with quarterback Sam Bradford and tight end Jermaine Gresham (pictured) declaring early

To my knowledge, they were both hurt last year, so he didn't really have them anyways...

And what about Cincy?? They only lost maybe the best coach that schools ever had.