Let's Look at Precedent

Landlord

Banned
I looked at the top 15 winningest programs and how they operated during their dark years with bad coaching hires, for some semblance of what has been done in the past and how it's worked out. Keep in mind, however, that we're already in pretty uncharted waters because many of these schools didn't get rid of 9-10 win coaches prior to. For ease of research and also to keep this discussion grounded in relevant, recent history, I only went back to 1990.

Michigan - Lloyd Carr "resigned" in 2007 with the pressure to head out, finishing with a 9-4 season ranked #18. They hired Rich Rod, who went 3-9 (worst season in school history), 5-7, and 7-6, and was then fired. They then hired Brady Hoke, who led them to a Sugar Bowl victory, but then didn't do much better. Despite really good recruiting, his staff (which was almost all former WVU staffers under him) was accused of not having a good atmosphere surrounding their program. Also of note, Bill Brandon was their AD who hired RR, then Dave Brandon was the AD who fired him, then hired Brady Hoke. Dave Brandon was fired last year for being a complete piece of crap.

Notre Dame - Lou Holtz "retired" amidst rumors of knowledge of serious NCAA violations, ending with an 8-3 season ranked #19. ND promoted Bob Davie, who was their DC at the time, and who went 7-6, 9-3, 5-7, 9-3, and 5-6, and was fired. It seems fans were never excited about the hire to begin with. He was playing with sanctions and probations, and another case of a coach being hired by one AD, and fired by another. ND hired George O'Leary, who resigned a few days later in disgrace when inaccuracies were found in his resume and biography, and then they hired Tyrone Willingham, who went 10-3, 5-7, 6-6, was fired, and then replaced by Charlie Weis, who went 9-3, 10-3, 3-9, 7-6, 6-6, and was fired.

Texas - Can't find anything really relevant for Texas, except for Charlie Strong, which is still in progress.

Ohio State - These a$$hole$ have always been great.

Alabama - Gene Stallings went 70-16 from 1990-1996, and resigned after the 1996 season. Partly due to sanctions, but following this, Mike DuBose was hired and went 4-7, 7-5, 10-3, and 3-8, after which he was fired. The last season was akin to our 2007 season, with preseason national championship aspirations. He actually tried to offer his resignation to the AD a few games in, but the AD would refuse, only to fire him a few games later but let him finish out the season. Alabama then hired Dennis Franchione, who, again, was hampered by NCAA violations committed before him, but went 7-5, and 10-3, and then left for Texas A&M. Alabama then hired Mike Shula, who went 4-9, 6-6, 10-3 (with all 10 wins vacated), and 6-7, and was fired, leading the way for Nick Saban.

Oklahoma - Gary Gibbs was hired to clean up Oklahoma's image, which he succeeded in, but was forced to resign after 6 decent seasons without signature big victories. OU hired Howard Schnellenberglerhage;i in 1995, who went 5-5-1, following the two previous seasons of 9-3, and 6-6 beforehand, but he unexpectedly resigned after the first season, saying, "in recent months a climate has developed toward the program, understandably in some cases and perhaps unfairly in others, that has changed my outlook on the situation. A change could help improve that climate." OU then hired John Blake, who went 3-8, 4-8, and 5-6, was fired, and led to the hiring of Bob Stoops.

Penn State - Nothing to see that is comparable here at all.

Tennessee - Phil Fulmer is Tennessee's version of Lloyd Carr, who led them to great and unprecedented success, but tailed off in the later parts of his career, and was eventually asked to graciously resign. Tennessee then hired Lane Kiffin, who went 7-6, and bolted for USC after one year. They then hired Derek Dooley, who went 6-7, 5-7, and 5-7. He was obviously fired, and replaced by Butch Jones, who has so far gone 5-7, 7-6, and 4-4 so far this year.

I've got a work meeting but I can look at more schools later, namely USC, Georgia, LSU, and Auburn, unless someone else would like to.

 
Oklahoma - Gary Gibbs was hired to clean up Oklahoma's image, which he succeeded in, but was forced to resign after 6 decent seasons without signature big victories. OU hired Howard Schnellenberglerhage;i in 1995, who went 5-5-1, following the two previous seasons of 9-3, and 6-6 beforehand, but he unexpectedly resigned after the first season, saying, "in recent months a climate has developed toward the program, understandably in some cases and perhaps unfairly in others, that has changed my outlook on the situation. A change could help improve that climate." OU then hired John Blake, who went 3-8, 4-8, and 5-6, was fired, and led to the hiring of Bob Stoops.
Pretty sure Howie was forced out at OU.

 
Oklahoma - Gary Gibbs was hired to clean up Oklahoma's image, which he succeeded in, but was forced to resign after 6 decent seasons without signature big victories. OU hired Howard Schnellenberglerhage;i in 1995, who went 5-5-1, following the two previous seasons of 9-3, and 6-6 beforehand, but he unexpectedly resigned after the first season, saying, "in recent months a climate has developed toward the program, understandably in some cases and perhaps unfairly in others, that has changed my outlook on the situation. A change could help improve that climate." OU then hired John Blake, who went 3-8, 4-8, and 5-6, was fired, and led to the hiring of Bob Stoops.
Pretty sure Howie was forced out at OU.
Yup. The "read-between-the-lines" version was that the AD and boosters forced him out. And Oklahoma did have plenty of options to fill the vacancy, in spite of Howard being one-and-done.

 
I definitely see the resemblance between our situation and Michigan and Tennessee. However, I don't think any of the rest are comparable. Bama, Ohio State, and OU all made their bed with regards to NCAA sanctions and probation. It was cheating that led to their demise. Penn State is in a category all by themselves. Notre Dame kept moving the goalposts. They allowed Holtz to recruit players under lower academic requirements than the general student body. When they changed this, he "retired". I don't know what to think about Texas. They're a mess, and there's really no explanation for it.

 
I definitely see the resemblance between our situation and Michigan and Tennessee. However, I don't think any of the rest are comparable. Bama, Ohio State, and OU all made their bed with regards to NCAA sanctions and probation. It was cheating that led to their demise. Penn State is in a category all by themselves. Notre Dame kept moving the goalposts. They allowed Holtz to recruit players under lower academic requirements than the general student body. When they changed this, he "retired". I don't know what to think about Texas. They're a mess, and there's really no explanation for it.
And despite the sanctions, there were plenty of coaching willing to take the positions.

 
If the money is right, there's always people willing to take it. In Bama and OU's case, they went through several coaches before finding "the one". If you ask some OU fans, they believe their "the one" needs replaced. Other than Saban, I'm not sure Bama or OU made splash hires. Stoops was a DC when hired by OU.

If Nebraska makes a change at season's end, I have no doubt the vacancy will be filled. However, I highly doubt it's the "splash" hire most fans desire.

 
W/r/t ND, there was some talk that Davie stabbed Holtz in the back. Another item of note w/r/t his time as ND's HC is he changed offenses twice. Brian Kelly's first team opened the season 4-4. Weis didn't recruit poorly overall but his team got softer as the years went on... I always appreciated that he seemed to have a knack for keeping the running game viable even when it wasn't terribly productive (still mixing in runs throughout the game such that it paid dividends in the 4th quarter).

 
"Splash" hires don't come to NU because very few guys with a lot of great options want to take on the challenge of a place like NU.

NCAA recruiting contact and use of aircraft restrictions have crippled NU since the early '00s. Coaches recognize that.

And fact: Lincoln is a nice, but not really nice, place to live. If I were an unaffiliated coach, I'd be looking south of the mason dixon and west of the rockies for countless reasons; I wouldn't even have to get to the question of "are the expectations unreasonable."

 
"Splash" hires don't come to NU because very few guys with a lot of great options want to take on the challenge of a place like NU.

NCAA recruiting contact and use of aircraft restrictions have crippled NU since the early '00s. Coaches recognize that.

And fact: Lincoln is a nice, but not really nice, place to live. If I were an unaffiliated coach, I'd be looking south of the mason dixon and west of the rockies for countless reasons; I wouldn't even have to get to the question of "are the expectations unreasonable."
Totally agree. it's why the decision to fire BO in the first place made me nervous even though I thought then and still do now that it was ultimately necessary because of how toxic it had become.

 
Hey CM. What are the current aircraft restrictions you mentioned. I was looking at the NCAA site and didn't see anything except regarding official visits which seemed fine

 
Hey CM. What are the current aircraft restrictions you mentioned. I was looking at the NCAA site and didn't see anything except regarding official visits which seemed fine
It's mainly around the use of private aircraft and timing re: "official" visits, which can be funded by the team.

As recently as the early 00s, you could fly a kid directly from his town to Lincoln on a private jet. That meant you could send a plane for a kid on Friday night, after a game, and have him settled in Lincoln by midnight. Now, you're looking at either bringing him in on a high school bye week or having him come in saturday morning on commercial air (and then they have to do the 1 hour drive from Epley on, lets just say, less than scenic roads).

There was a NYT article about the new restrictions that went in around 2000. I'll look for it, but if you google for it, you shoudl be able to find it (Bowden, Virginia Tech, NCAA recruiting restrictions, and Nebraska would be good key words).

 
here you go:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43898-2004Aug5.html

Bowden says schools that have a fertile recruiting base in their own states, and don't have to recruit nationally, will not be affected by the new rules. But schools in states that don't traditionally produce a lot of college football prospects -- such as Nebraska, South Carolina and Tennessee -- could be most affected by the changes.

"I feel like schools in the state of Florida, you can cut down all the rules you want, and it will affect us less than anybody," Bowden said. "The people it hurts when you start restricting travel are state schools that have to depend on the whole country to get their players, such as Nebraska. I don't think it will hurt schools in Texas, California and Georgia. Why? Because they are the most productive states in the United States for college football players."
Beyond this idea of "ending the entitlement culture" (which obviously hasn't worked), the restricted campus contact has killed Nebraska. It used to be, a coach could spend the money to visit a kid on a HS campus about as much as they wanted. Now the player has to initiate contact.

Who does that benefit? the school whose campus is down the street, while it kills remote schools.

And does it help recruits? of course not; if anything, it hurts them because they get less information about an important decision.

Personally, I'd like the NCAA to lift all these sorts of restrictions but develop a "no call list" for players and their families to utilize. A coach can contact as much as he wants up until being put on the list by a recruit. Clean and easy way to regulate contact while also adding real accountability for the actual cheaters (because recruits and families would be willing to report violations).

But don't get me started on the other piece of this that needs to change, and that's the concept of "offer and acceptance" versus "soft offers and 'verbal commitments.'"

The current system of signing day only benefits big schools and recruiting media. A true offer and acceptance system would greatly benefit schools like Nebraska because they'd be able to make a real offer to a kid that Alabama, Texas or Ohio State is just slow playing. We'd know real quick who "is getting the love."

Unfortunately, too many twitter and other shoddy reports benefit from the drama.

 
This was all I found regarding official visits. Based on this it would seem like the private plane option would still be viable as long as they left before Sunday night

http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/loyc/genrel/auto_pdf/NCAAOfficialVisitRules.pdf

Yeah, that's how that informal guidance reads... hard to say whether it's accurate.

I really wish the NCAA didn't hide the ball when it came to these rules (they are almost as complex as the tax code)

 
The only way firing Bo Pelini would have made sense is if Eichorst already had another coach lined up, i.e., a gentleman's agreement (McElwain or Fuente or Pat Narduzzi etc.). Otherwise, it looks to be a disastrous blow to the program, no sugarcoating it.

 
Back
Top