I won't kid anybody - I know very little about what it takes to be an offensive linemen. I played tackle football when I was younger, but I was nowhere near big enough to be considered any type of linemen. The closest thing I ever got to consistently blocking was playing a little full back and some perimeter blocking as a WR.
Our offense line against Iowa State, Kansas, and Texas A&m was, for the most part, embarrassed. They were pushed around all night, getting blown off the ball, or just not picking up blocks. Considering that both ISU and KU are much less talented on the defensive line, this is disheartening.
I'm curious, for those of you who have played on the lines or for those of you that know quite a bit about it, what is it exactly that this unit isn't doing when they are playing?
To me, it's clearly not a strength issue. Dobson is one of the best S&C coaches in the country and I don't think there is any debating that.
I also have trouble believing it to be a motivation issue. This team has arguably more reason than any other team in recent memory to succeed, just by going off of the fact that we have a huge target on our backs for leaving the conference and because of what happened last year in the title game.
So, what gives? Is it technique? Is it in fact the coaches not correctly motivating our players to dominate the guy in front of them? Opinions?
Our offense line against Iowa State, Kansas, and Texas A&m was, for the most part, embarrassed. They were pushed around all night, getting blown off the ball, or just not picking up blocks. Considering that both ISU and KU are much less talented on the defensive line, this is disheartening.
I'm curious, for those of you who have played on the lines or for those of you that know quite a bit about it, what is it exactly that this unit isn't doing when they are playing?
To me, it's clearly not a strength issue. Dobson is one of the best S&C coaches in the country and I don't think there is any debating that.
I also have trouble believing it to be a motivation issue. This team has arguably more reason than any other team in recent memory to succeed, just by going off of the fact that we have a huge target on our backs for leaving the conference and because of what happened last year in the title game.
So, what gives? Is it technique? Is it in fact the coaches not correctly motivating our players to dominate the guy in front of them? Opinions?
Last edited by a moderator: