Do some of you perhaps think it should be the same thing? The word commitment is becoming a joke, and many HC players are probably using it so they don't get bumped if there is no more room. Some seem to be commiting to more than one school. And the signing period should be much earlier -- the whole thing goes on way too long. And if something like this took place, I can only vision a recruit able to change his mind if the college HC resigns, gets fired, or there is hard proof that the college lied to the kid.
The college could only take away the LOI for legal and academic reasons. And yes I realize NU has gotten a few decommitments in the past. Perhaps we should get rid of commiting and force the kids and their families to think harder on what school they should attend? Or perhaps should there be one day, perhaps a month before LOI day, where the recruits can change their commitments, but there-after they are forced to honor their commitments?
The college could only take away the LOI for legal and academic reasons. And yes I realize NU has gotten a few decommitments in the past. Perhaps we should get rid of commiting and force the kids and their families to think harder on what school they should attend? Or perhaps should there be one day, perhaps a month before LOI day, where the recruits can change their commitments, but there-after they are forced to honor their commitments?