Nebraska already favored to win Big XII in 2007

BIGREDFAN_in_OMAHA

All-American
OMH

Lee Barfknecht: Nebraska can rise high in Big 12

BY LEE BARFKNECHT

WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

DALLAS - After a week on the bowl circuit to cover three football games involving Big 12 schools, some of my sportswriter colleagues have asked an interesting question:

Should Nebraska be favored to win the 2007 Big 12 championship?

Not just the North Division. We're talking the whole thing.

My brethren think it's possible. I think the odds are better than that - at least 50-50.

(Most of you by now have probably dropped your newspaper, reading that from me. So pick it back up and stick with me here).

Don't lose a whole bunch of sleep over Monday's 17-14 loss in the Cotton Bowl to No. 10 Auburn.

A bowl setback, unless it's in the BCS title game, doesn't "disrupt the order" any more than last season's Alamo Bowl victory over Michigan "restored the order." It was just one game after a long layoff played at a faraway site with not much on the line.

What should be of immediate concern for Nebraska fans are two trend lines from this season that need to be fixed before that "next step" can occur.

One is the offensive blackouts that occur far too often in the second half.

Case in point: Monday's 73 yards and no points in the final 30 minutes against Auburn. That has to change, regardless of how vigorously NU coach Bill Callahan and his staff claim good adjustments are being made.

The second is Callahan's pull-a-rabbit-out-the-hat mentality. Somebody needs to take the hat clear away from him, so he can't call a fake punt on his 29-yard line like he did Monday.

I know some old-time defensive players who might slug a coach for attempting that, even if it worked. Callahan, who should have received votes as Auburn's most valuable player, needs to quit trying to show how smart he is and stick to the strengths he has developed in his system.

Nebraska was the better team for most of the game. Yet Auburn will stay in the final Top 10 and the No. 22 Huskers likely will fall out of the rankings.

With that, you may ask, how can I consider picking Nebraska to win the Big 12 in 2007?

Part of it is because this league will be a jumble. No one will be dominant. Note that NU's loss to Auburn dropped the Big 12's record against ranked nonconference foes to 0-13.

Looking strictly at Nebraska, three things make me think a title run may be imminent:

• Quarterback Sam Keller. God bless Zac Taylor. He will forever be hailed as a Husker hero for his guts and leadership.

But to win championships, your quarterback needs to have the raw ability to win those last few games by himself. Taylor couldn't. But Keller might, if the one-year transfer from Arizona State is as good as everyone claims.

• The schedule. It's difficult, but that's a plus. Facing Nevada (MPC Computers Bowl), Wake Forest (Orange Bowl) and USC (Rose Bowl) in September will force this team to train and focus like never before, setting a seasonlong tone.

• It's Year Four for Callahan. When regime change occurred in Nebraska football, many of the big billfolds agreed that the fourth year would offer the first real indicator of how this era will unfold. Callahan knows it's time to make a move.

Athletic Director Steve Pederson, who hired Callahan after firing Frank Solich, is three years into his 51/2-year contract that runs through June 2008.

When Chancellor Harvey Perlman was asked recently if Pederson is due an extension soon, Perlman gave no hints, saying: "Those things will be discussed at an appropriate time."

No word is available, either, on whether Pederson is considering a contract extension for Callahan, who is halfway through his six-year deal.

Any decision on longer deals for both men would be made a lot easier if the Husker trophy case gets expanded to accommodate the 2007 Big 12 championship trophy.

 
OMH

Lee Barfknecht: Nebraska can rise high in Big 12

BY LEE BARFKNECHT

WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

DALLAS - After a week on the bowl circuit to cover three football games involving Big 12 schools, some of my sportswriter colleagues have asked an interesting question:

Should Nebraska be favored to win the 2007 Big 12 championship?

Not just the North Division. We're talking the whole thing.

My brethren think it's possible. I think the odds are better than that - at least 50-50.

(Most of you by now have probably dropped your newspaper, reading that from me. So pick it back up and stick with me here).

i am ok, really, only sustained superficial cuts and bruises!

Don't lose a whole bunch of sleep over Monday's 17-14 loss in the Cotton Bowl to No. 10 Auburn.

A bowl setback, unless it's in the BCS title game, doesn't "disrupt the order" any more than last season's Alamo Bowl victory over Michigan "restored the order." It was just one game ( a famous cally quote?.....hmmmm) after a long layoff played at a faraway site with not much on the line.

What should be of immediate concern for Nebraska fans are two trend lines from this season that need to be fixed before that "next step" can occur.

One is the offensive blackouts that occur far too often in the second half.

Case in point: Monday's 73 yards and no points in the final 30 minutes against Auburn. That has to change, regardless of how vigorously NU coach Bill Callahan and his staff claim good adjustments are being made.

The second is Callahan's pull-a-rabbit-out-the-hat mentality. Somebody needs to take the hat clear away from him, so he can't call a fake punt on his 29-yard line like he did Monday.

I know some old-time defensive players who might slug a coach for attempting that, even if it worked. Callahan, who should have received votes as Auburn's most valuable player, needs to quit trying to show how smart he is and stick to the strengths he has developed in his system.

Nebraska was the better team for most of the game. Yet Auburn will stay in the final Top 10 and the No. 22 Huskers likely will fall out of the rankings.

With that, you may ask, how can I consider picking Nebraska to win the Big 12 in 2007?

Part of it is because this league will be a jumble. No one will be dominant. Note that NU's loss to Auburn dropped the Big 12's record against ranked nonconference foes to 0-13.

Looking strictly at Nebraska, three things make me think a title run may be imminent:

• Quarterback Sam Keller. God bless Zac Taylor. He will forever be hailed as a Husker hero for his guts and leadership. (yep, this may have been cally's early Christmas present this fall!)

But to win championships, your quarterback needs to have the raw ability to win those last few games by himself. Taylor couldn't. But Keller might, if the one-year transfer from Arizona State is as good as everyone claims.

• The schedule. It's difficult, but that's a plus. Facing Nevada (MPC Computers Bowl), Wake Forest (Orange Bowl) and USC (Rose Bowl) in September will force this team to train and focus like never before, setting a seasonlong tone. ( idunno about that,look what Okie State did to us!)

• It's Year Four for Callahan. When regime change occurred in Nebraska football, many of the big billfolds agreed that the fourth year would offer the first real indicator of how this era will unfold. Callahan knows it's time to make a move. (one would hope to see some better rational in play calling?)

Athletic Director Steve Pederson, who hired Callahan after firing Frank Solich, is three years into his 51/2-year contract that runs through June 2008.

When Chancellor Harvey Perlman was asked recently if Pederson is due an extension soon, Perlman gave no hints, saying: "Those things will be discussed at an appropriate time." intersting

No word is available, either, on whether Pederson is considering a contract extension for Callahan, who is halfway through his six-year deal. interesting

Any decision on longer deals for both men would be made a lot easier if the Husker trophy case gets expanded to accommodate the 2007 Big 12 championship trophy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In all honesty, why would we consider extending his contract when he has three years left. IMO, the best time for a contract extention is when there is one year left. There is really no rush for us to sign him, unless we think someone else is going to offer him a huge contract and that he will bolt for them, which would force the new team to pay us the remainder of his contract.

 
In all honesty, why would we consider extending his contract when he has three years left. IMO, the best time for a contract extention is when there is one year left. There is really no rush for us to sign him, unless we think someone else is going to offer him a huge contract and that he will bolt for them, which would force the new team to pay us the remainder of his contract.
i agree, the cake is only "half baked"..........

 
I think our main goal next year should be going to a BCS bowl. That would mean winning the big 12 championship. I will be dissapointed if we dont. We have the talent to do it, we just have to play 4 quarters in evry game and I think we will win the big 12.

 
I think our main goal next year should be going to a BCS bowl. That would mean winning the big 12 championship. I will be dissapointed if we dont. We have the talent to do it, we just have to play 4 quarters in evry game and I think we will win the big 12.
:yeah I as well think we should be able able to win the Big 12. We should win the Big North next year with some ease. Once again, USC will be our lithmus test. They will be TOUGH next year, but we have them in Lincoln. Keller will want some payback. AaH said it, we have to play 4 quarters of football, something we did not do a lot of this year. We need to get up on teams and not allow them back in it. We actually beat ourselves in most of our losses this year. Call me crazy, but I think Callahan will learn a lot from this season and will beat some teams next season that he did not this season.

 
I think we all know what needs to be done to turn the corner both on the offensive and defensive side of the ball and in addition I think we need a couple of new position coaches.

 
You could extend Callahan's contract now for another 2yrs or 5yrs. What does it matter? If someone wants out of their contract they can. It happens all the time. The days of someone honoring their contract is gone.

GBR!!!

 
Nebraska has my vote. You guys are a microfiber away from putting it all together. Your defense is great. It will keep you in games. Get that offense figured out and you are on your way. :)

WARRRR EAGLEE!!!

 
AT the end of next season he really needs a contract extection if they plan on keeping him. Otherwise it builds uncertanty with recruiting. They want to know the cpach is going to be there for thier career.

 
Don't lose a whole bunch of sleep over Monday's 17-14 loss in the Cotton Bowl to No. 10 Auburn.
Don't worry.......I havent! I'm half way to next season already.....
:clap I don't think we will extend his contract until there is only one year left on it and that all depends on what happens next season. Next season he will have all the players he has recruited there and all the option players will be gone. I think we will win the Big XII next season and go to a BCS Bowl and those are my HONEST opinions. If we can figure out why we play so horrible in the second half we will stomp some teams.

 
Back
Top