Nebraska defense wants to be a strength

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/98413/nebraska-defense-wants-to-b-as-strength

All-league defensive end Randy Gregory and his teammates want a new label for 2014.

Dominant or suffocating -- either is fine. How about being the strength of coach Bo Pelini’s seventh team?

“Definitely,” Gregory said. “Let’s be physical. We can dominate. If we play our game, we can play with anybody.”

The defensive performance and growth this spring appear to substantiate Gregory’s claim. This Nebraska defense looks stronger, deeper and more physical than any of the past few seasons.

 
We all want this. We deserve a legitimately nasty Blackshirt squad. 3 years of Big Ten play and we have yet to see that unfold. I think the pieces are in place for it to happen this year, and looking at the mindset of Gregory and friends......Im pretty hopeful.

 
There were times when the Blackshirts looked great last season. Despite some key injuries. Still, we got a long ways to go before we can speak of these guys in the same sentence as the '94-'95 Blackshirts.

 
There were times when the Blackshirts looked great last season. Despite some key injuries. Still, we got a long ways to go before we can speak of these guys in the same sentence as the '94-'95 Blackshirts.
Exactly. Lots of promise. I see several guys that could build a scary reputation. If we can get back to that mindframe we could be feared again.

 
If McMullen comes on this year, we are gonna be terrifying. I think it all starts up front on D, and with Gregory & McMullen at end, and VV, Collins, and Curry at tackle, this could be a unit that top-to-bottom stacks up against any DL we've ever had under Bo Pelini. Certainly this group of LBs might easily be our best ever. And the secondary...well, at least, there's more legitimate promise here than any year since 2010.

Not really going out on a limb, but I think it's reasonable to expect Bo Pelini to remind everyone this year why he's always been regarded as one of the top defensive minds in the country. He's got all the pieces. It took a while to get them back in place, but hey, we here now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It took longer than expected to get those pieces in place. But would you say it was due to neglect of recruiting or more due to the conference switch?

 
Recruiting.

To be fair, no team hits all the time. Down cycles are inevitable and hit everybody. I do think that recruiting early in Bo's tenure (whether it was misses, numbers, etc) was very noticeable in 2011, 2012, and to an extent 2013.

Personally, I don't figure the conference switch into it very much. I mean, where was the surplus of excellent defensive backs that we just couldn't put on the field because we had to run the base more than the nickel/dime (No disrespect to Lance Thorell and Justin Blatchford).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although some of the Big Ten is changing to more of an open short passing style of offense similar to the Big 12, we weren't ready for the bigger more physical O and D lines of the upper Big Ten schools when we came in. The better teams had maulers on both lines of scrimmage we didn't match up well with. It put extra pressure on our LB's and DB's which caused problems when they had to help more on run support. We appear to be more ready this year.

 
The thing I don't get about that argument is that if we were so unprepared for B1G style football, why did we have such tremendous defensive success against Michigan State, Penn State, and Iowa (all good teams that year)?

 
The thing I don't get about that argument is that if we were so unprepared for B1G style football, why did we have such tremendous defensive success against Michigan State, Penn State, and Iowa (all good teams that year)?
I like to think its because we have a defensive minded coach and his gameplan worked really well. The Wisconsin, Michigan, and heck even Ohio State defensive showings were the opposite.

2012 I feel is when the shift was apparent. We werent nearly deep enough in several spots when injuries took their toll and I think the positional changeups had something to do with it. Correct me if Im wrong but perhaps the recruiting wasnt inept, it was just for a different style of play, there fore we saw just how shallow the roster was when we adjusted our defensive schemes and personnel

 
The thing I don't get about that argument is that if we were so unprepared for B1G style football, why did we have such tremendous defensive success against Michigan State, Penn State, and Iowa (all good teams that year)?
My feeling is that Bo thought he had to adjust more than he did. It seemed like for a year or so we went to more of a larger DE and LB which gave up some speed. Then, we simply had a couple years of misses on the DL that exacerbated that problem.

Now, we seem to be going back to more speed and we have had (what seems like now) better luck at recruiting DLinemen.

 
The thing I don't get about that argument is that if we were so unprepared for B1G style football, why did we have such tremendous defensive success against Michigan State, Penn State, and Iowa (all good teams that year)?
Becuase those were teams with conventional, prostyle offenses that offered ZERO threat of running out of the qb position. Bo's wheelhouse as I like to call it.

Now when I say different from the Big10 to Big 12, yes, there are some spread teams in the Big10. And this is a point I'm pretty sure I've hammered on a few times on here. Now dont watch what Big 12 teams are doing now. Watch what they were doing in Bo's 3 years as coach in the Big 12. Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Ok St, Kansas, Texas Tech and so on used a primary passing game with very little running. Very little balance. between 40 and 50 passes a game on a normal basis. Little qb running with guys like Landry Jones, Gram Harrel, Colt McCoy, Reising, Gabbert. Mobile qb's but not the running threats that we see from the spreads in the Big 10. Those Big 12 offenses were mostly snap the ball in the gun and sling it all over the place. The big10 spreads have qb's like Braxton Miller, Cain Colter, Dennard Robinson, Gardner, the qb over at Indiana. Dynamic runners playing the qb position and providing a whole nother dimension to the offense. A thorough balance we did not see in the Big 12. Not to mention, when in the big 12, Bo tended to utilize fewer backers and more DB's. Smaller DL to get a pass rush. We knew plays were gonna be pass plays most times. It really is quite a bit different from what the Big 12 was when we were in it, to what the Big 10 has been.

Another thing is, we went from a very solid and dominating D in 2009 and 2010, to pretty much bad in 2011. That doesnt happen for no reason. I know we lost a lot in the secondary from 2010, but we still returned LaVonte and the whole DL. When you change conferences, youre not just facing one new team in a year. Youre facing a new team every week. And every player on that team that was not in their first year, had to relearn how to defend new offenses that they had not seen yet. Every weeks a curve ball. Every tendancy Bo had found was out the window. All familiarity that had been built in 3 years was gone. I know it sounds like an excuse, but I think our change in recruiting philosphy over the past few years in loading up on more size and talent at LB and DL should be more than enough to say that playing defense in the Big10 is different than what it was playing in the Big12 back then. And dont forget, we joined the Big10 in the summer of 2010, with still a season (of very high expectations I might add) to play yet in the Big12-so with basically only one year to prepare for Big10 play. So to me, yes, the conference is still a very big part of the past 3 years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The thing I don't get about that argument is that if we were so unprepared for B1G style football, why did we have such tremendous defensive success against Michigan State, Penn State, and Iowa (all good teams that year)?
Becuase those were teams with conventional, prostyle offenses that offered ZERO threat of running out of the qb position. Bo's wheelhouse as I like to call it.

Now when I say different from the Big10 to Big 12, yes, there are some spread teams in the Big10. And this is a point I'm pretty sure I've hammered on a few times on here. Now dont watch what Big 12 teams are doing now. Watch what they were doing in Bo's 3 years as coach in the Big 12. Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Ok St, Kansas, Texas Tech and so on used a primary passing game with very little running. Very little balance. between 40 and 50 passes a game on a normal basis. Little qb running with guys like Landry Jones, Gram Harrel, Colt McCoy, Reising, Gabbert. Mobile qb's but not the running threats that we see from the spreads in the Big 10. Those Big 12 offenses were mostly snap the ball in the gun and sling it all over the place. The big10 spreads have qb's like Braxton Miller, Cain Colter, Dennard Robinson, Gardner, the qb over at Indiana. Dynamic runners playing the qb position and providing a whole nother dimension to the offense. A thorough balance we did not see in the Big 12. Not to mention, when in the big 12, Bo tended to utilize fewer backers and more DB's. Smaller DL to get a pass rush. We knew plays were gonna be pass plays most times. It really is quite a bit different from what the Big 12 was when we were in it, to what the Big 10 has been.

Another thing is, we went from a very solid and dominating D in 2009 and 2010, to pretty much bad in 2011. That doesnt happen for no reason. I know we lost a lot in the secondary from 2010, but we still returned LaVonte and the whole DL. When you change conferences, youre not just facing one new team in a year. Youre facing a new team every week. And every player on that team that was not in their first year, had to relearn how to defend new offenses that they had not seen yet. Every weeks a curve ball. Every tendancy Bo had found was out the window. All familiarity that had been built in 3 years was gone. I know it sounds like an excuse, but I think our change in recruiting philosphy over the past few years in loading up on more size and talent at LB and DL should be more than enough to say that playing defense in the Big10 is different than what it was playing in the Big12 back then. And dont forget, we joined the Big10 in the summer of 2010, with still a season (of very high expectations I might add) to play yet in the Big12-so with basically only one year to prepare for Big10 play. So to me, yes, the conference is still a very big part of the past 3 years.

And, because we didn't use as many LBs in the Big 12, we didn't have as many in the program. We decided to switch conferences, Bo had basically one recruiting cycle and then we were playing Big 10 ball. This isn't the NFL where he could just go out and get 5 experienced free agent LBs for the next year.

People who claim switching conferences didn't have an affect on us are either ill informed of what exactly all happened or they are practicing revisionist history to prop up their arguments.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top