Actually, it's not....but, it's being taken differently.
In my original post I said it's "unacceptable." That's not different than saying "You should be expected to shoot a certain percentage from the line at this level."
I'm guessing that most coaches at this level would have no problem using either terminology when discussing what level of free throw percentage they expect from their team.
That’s not in what I said in the post you quoted as what I said coaches would say.Please point me to some examples when "most coaches at this level" have referred to free throws as "almost automatic"
I’m not a basketball expert by any means, but I’m surprised that there is so much vitriol in this thread defending low FT percentage.
I didn’t realize that national averages and NBA averages were not higher, but I’m with BRB on this one. We shot worse than usual free throws in the game, which contributed to the loss. Is it not reasonable to want better, and more consistent, free throw shooting? Isn’t that a fundamental part of basketball that these players and coaches should be able to improve upon?