Next Week vs Wake...

tattooedhusker

tattooedhusker

All-Conference
I don't know if he's the starter, but from what i've read over on the WF board Riley Skinner appears to have suffered a seperated shoulder. link

 
He is in fact their starter. No way to tell exactly how long he will be out but with a separated shoulder he is most definitely out for the game next week I would think. That is not usually a quick fix injury.

 
Actually, it isn't good for us as his backup looked every bit as good as him.

Riley hurt it a bit earlier in the game, tried to gut it out, then finally figured out how much his arm was actually hurting. lol

I really hate Riley went down with injury, as if we walk out of Winston-Salem with a victory, their will be the Deac fans saying "well if we had Riley."

Wake also lost their top defensive lineman to what they were calling a 'high ankle sprain'. His foot was in a boot on the sideline.

 
Wake rushed for a total of 2 yards and they gave up over 400 yards through the air!!! They don't appear to be a strong as they were last year, but it is only one game. I would think a win would be likely if we have over 400 yds in the air and hold them under 10 yards rushing. :nutz

 
hazer1mike said:
Wake rushed for a total of 2 yards and they gave up over 400 yards through the air!!! They don't appear to be a strong as they were last year, but it is only one game. I would think a win would be likely if we have over 400 yds in the air and hold them under 10 yards rushing. :nutz
Click to expand...
Wake was really one dimensional. I don't think they can do that against the Huskers without getting killed.

 
Personally I wouldn't expect a high-flying aerial show for this one. Whether or not anyone will admit it, all that's on the team's mind is SC. The reason I think Callahan is going to rush the ball against Wake much like he did at Nevada (provided it is any bit as effective), is that SC will see an uncanny resemblence to our former days, and have to modify their defensive schemes to counter it, and it will will ultimately leave them vulnerable when the entire playbook is unfolded before their eyes. I think we'll pass, but not nearly as much as we would if it was SC. I know the offensive scheme calls for balance, but what the SC coaches see in the film room is crucial to the chess game of the season in the larger sense.

I could be wrong, but that's what I would do. Murderate those Deacon bastards just like we did to Nevada, and then when SC comes into the sea of red, they won't have the first damn clue what to expect from Keller and his dragons at wide receiver.

:bonez And USC must be razed to the ground. :bonez

 
Husker_x said:
Personally I wouldn't expect a high-flying aerial show for this one. Whether or not anyone will admit it, all that's on the team's mind is SC. The reason I think Callahan is going to rush the ball against Wake much like he did at Nevada (provided it is any bit as effective), is that SC will see an uncanny resemblence to our former days, and have to modify their defensive schemes to counter it, and it will will ultimately leave them vulnerable when the entire playbook is unfolded before their eyes. I think we'll pass, but not nearly as much as we would if it was SC. I know the offensive scheme calls for balance, but what the SC coaches see in the film room is crucial to the chess game of the season in the larger sense.

I could be wrong, but that's what I would do. Murderate those Deacon bastards just like we did to Nevada, and then when SC comes into the sea of red, they won't have the first damn clue what to expect from Keller and his dragons at wide receiver.

:bonez And USC must be razed to the ground. :bonez
Click to expand...
Dude, I think you're spot on. We'll pass enough to get Mo's feet wet. Hopefully, our D can get more sacks.

 
IMO BC will do whatever he thinks will work. I doubt anything is held in reserve, just not used if not needed. If BC sees he can run it downhill all day long that's what we'll see. If the run is being stymied he'll try to loosen up the D by using quick timed passes in the horizontal lanes (traditional philosophy of the WCO). What we'll see depends solely on the game plan and how the game unfolds in real time.

 
FriscoTXHusker said:
IMO BC will do whatever he thinks will work. I doubt anything is held in reserve, just not used if not needed. If BC sees he can run it downhill all day long that's what we'll see. If the run is being stymied he'll try to loosen up the D by using quick timed passes in the horizontal lanes (traditional philosophy of the WCO). What we'll see depends solely on the game plan and how the game unfolds in real time.
Click to expand...

:yeah

 
borNred said:
I don't know if he's the starter, but from what i've read over on the WF board Riley Skinner appears to have suffered a seperated shoulder. link
Click to expand...
depends on if it was his throwing shoulder. if it was not a shot of cortazone and he could play next week, if it was then 2-3 weeks for a mild seperation befor ehe can throw without any pain

 
The last thing we need is another vanilla QB against whom to "test" our Blackshirts before we face JD Booty.

 
FriscoTXHusker said:
IMO BC will do whatever he thinks will work. I doubt anything is held in reserve, just not used if not needed. If BC sees he can run it downhill all day long that's what we'll see. If the run is being stymied he'll try to loosen up the D by using quick timed passes in the horizontal lanes (traditional philosophy of the WCO). What we'll see depends solely on the game plan and how the game unfolds in real time.
Click to expand...
Agreed. The converse of the "don't reveal the playbook argument" is that the more you open it up, the more SC has to prepare. Further, with a new starter at quarterback we need to get him some game reps in this offense to get the timing down. I think we'll start with the run, but that we'll see a higher number of passes against Wake.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top