NU Athletics: '08 budget $2 million smaller

OnTheEdge

Walk-on
NU Athletics: '08 budget $2 million smaller

BY RICH KAIPUST

WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

LINCOLN — Nebraska's athletic budget is scheduled to decrease by more than $2 million in this fiscal year, and a major reason is an 18-percent decrease in debt payments.

Nebraska's expenses for the 2007 fiscal year, which ended June 30, included almost $10.2 million in debt and lease payments. That figure is projected at $8.3 million for 2008.

Nancy Kenny, chief financial officer for the NU athletic department, said the lower figure is the result of recent payoffs of a lease agreement for Haymarket Park and an improvement project for the Devaney Center.

"The rest of our debt is primarily associated with the West Stadium skyboxes and this new building (Osborne Complex)," Kenny said Tuesday.

"Like most Nebraskans, we strive to be very aggressive in the lowering of our debt obligations. This is a priority for us, and we are very proud of our track record in this area."

Nebraska projected its 2008 budget at $66.7 million. The 2007 budget was $68.9 million.

The 2007 budget included a one-time expense for the $5 million video board at Memorial Stadium. That was mostly covered under transfers from the University of Nebraska Foundation, which are projected to drop from $16.8 million to $10.8 million.

Ticket revenue is projected to increase 13 percent to $31 million in 2008. Football ticket prices increased 8.3 percent this year. Kenny said another portion of the increased revenue will come from men's basketball — with three more home games, a slight increase in ticket prices and an expected rise in sales.

The budgeted deficit for Husker basketball is just more than $675,000, but Kenny said that figure does not include television-related revenue. If included, she said, "men's basketball would finish in the black."

NU's debt payments will decrease again in 2009 when the last payments are made on the 10-year bond for the $36 million West Stadium project. By 2010, the only major debt to be paid off will be the remaining portion of a 20-year bond for the $35 million borrowed for the Osborne Complex and North Stadium renovation.

Of the $40 million the athletic department hoped to raise, Kenny said, current contributions and pledges total about $31 million. About $3.5 million in revenue is generated annually by the new North Stadium seats, skyboxes and contributions that go with them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In case thiems was wondering, as it seems by the title of this thread. The reason teams like Ball St come here is for the paycheck. No paycheck, no team, no game.

 
Need a BCS game in Jan to help pay the bills!

(I bet Pederson and Co was counting on one by now.)

 
In case thiems was wondering, as it seems by the title of this thread. The reason teams like Ball St come here is for the paycheck. No paycheck, no team, no game.
Yeah, I agree. Decreasing the budget by $2 million in this scenario is completely rational and a good thing. Way to bait people by giving them the title of the article and that comment.

 
It sounds like you guys are reading this as they are taking something away from the athletic program. If I am reading the article correctly is that it is just saying they don't have to budget as much for debt payoffs on projects. In other words, they have paid off enough of a chunk so far, that they don't need to budget quite as much for things.

EXAMPLE - for us, say you make $3000/mo. And you have mortgage, utilities, every day bills...and a car payment. You have to budget $2500/mo for all of that. However if you pay off your car, you don't have to budget a $300 payment into your monthly figures anymore. You still have/make the same amount of money, you just have to budget $2200/mo now.

 
It sounds like you guys are reading this as they are taking something away from the athletic program. If I am reading the article correctly is that it is just saying they don't have to budget as much for debt payoffs on projects. In other words, they have paid off enough of a chunk so far, that they don't need to budget quite as much for things.

EXAMPLE - for us, say you make $3000/mo. And you have mortgage, utilities, every day bills...and a car payment. You have to budget $2500/mo for all of that. However if you pay off your car, you don't have to budget a $300 payment into your monthly figures anymore. You still have/make the same amount of money, you just have to budget $2200/mo now.
Bingo. Simply put, the budget is smaller because there is less debt that has to be serviced.

In other words, this is a good thing... :thumbs

 
Need a BCS game in Jan to help pay the bills!

(I bet Pederson and Co was counting on one by now.)
Pretty sure that bowl money goes to the conference and then divided among the teams. If the Big 12 could get an "extra" team into a BCS bowl, that would mean more money for everyone. The best chance of getting an extra team into the division is if the winner of the north division wins the Big 12 championship game.

 
Need a BCS game in Jan to help pay the bills!

(I bet Pederson and Co was counting on one by now.)
Pretty sure that bowl money goes to the conference and then divided among the teams. If the Big 12 could get an "extra" team into a BCS bowl, that would mean more money for everyone. The best chance of getting an extra team into the division is if the winner of the north division wins the Big 12 championship game.

The BCS revenue might, but the Television revenue doesn't, neither does the merchandising revenue or the gate from the game itself.

 
Need a BCS game in Jan to help pay the bills!

(I bet Pederson and Co was counting on one by now.)
Pretty sure that bowl money goes to the conference and then divided among the teams. If the Big 12 could get an "extra" team into a BCS bowl, that would mean more money for everyone. The best chance of getting an extra team into the division is if the winner of the north division wins the Big 12 championship game.

The BCS revenue might, but the Television revenue doesn't, neither does the merchandising revenue or the gate from the game itself.
Yeah, merchandise revenue I understand. But I thought everything else, television, gate, etc., went to the conference and then split among the teams. Not sure, just thought that's the way it worked. I might have to google it...

 
"Currently, all sources of revenue outside of television are shared equally among the 12 schools. Only half of television revenue is shared equally. The other half is placed in an "appearance pool." Schools earn monetary units based on football appearances and on national TV non-conference basketball appearances."

Dallas Morning News Article

 
Back
Top