i'm not sure that i agree with the author's criteria for determining the best "two sport" schools. under his system, school that dominates one sport but is horrible at the other gets a respectable rating. case in point is Illinois, which is listed number 42. they dominate basketball, but their football program is a joke (they've won like one conference game in five years). that's not a sign of a good "two sport" school. i would say that nebraska, with a weak basketball team, and a mediocre (though rebuilding) football team, over the last few years is more of a two sport school than illinois.