HuskerNBigD
Starter
Do you think Dirk used a time-series analysis for the conclusion? Hope he corrected for any unit roots.
I can't speak to HUDL, but I would say the latter is partly true. He's not wrong in his conclusion, but it's not a very stable argument he presents.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought I heard Dan Hoppen say this on 1620 with Sharp and Benning, HUDL is known to have some wicked good stats. Have they looked into this "phenomenon" or is Dirk stretching for something like many writers do when trying to prove a point they already lean towards believing in?