HUSKER 37
All-American
Still not seeing where one guy would be better than 3.(At least in theory)..:blink: huh?What?
Now Bo doesn't know how to coach?
Either he does or he doesn't.
BO KNOWS FOOTBALL!!
we just post on the internet.
GO BO!!
I do know football. Relax dawg. Sorry if it bothers you or some that I think differently than Bo on the I-back rotation. I cannot be more clear: The rotating of running backs is way underperforming.
I know, back when they wore leather helmets (or in highschool) there was enough separation between the 1st teamer and his back-ups that leaving your starter in seemed to work out well...
Heck..some neanderthals even seemed to thrive on more carries and getting better the more tired they got, but from a purely physiological standpoint, it just makes no sense.
But there's so much overlap in these guys' abilities, and with injuries, you'll probably need more than a couple of backs with "quality carries" throughout the season..Plus you need to keep them happy enough to keep them from transferring to UNO.
Trying to improve the running game by ignoring the O-line and concentrating on funneling the carries to one back is sorta like trying to improve your gas mileage by getting a satellite radio in your car instead of inflating your tires properly.
Although listening to "bossanova" music did get me to slow down a little (for a week?) so you might have something there.
:clap
I would, however draw the line at having the RB play both ways (Offense and Defense) just to get him tired (primed?) enough to get him in a rhythm..
Last edited by a moderator: