He played with all the talent he has, can't ask for more than that, but your right he did do what he was supposed to do, just like the rest of the team. So no need in giving props to any of them, right... :confuciusThere is nothing to eat crow about. He made routine plays that he is supposed to make....big deal. He's still a liability.
perhaps maybe some crow should be consumed when many posters, and Iand guessing you are one, claimed Fish wasn't good enough to play well in any form or fashion. Personally I thought he did well holding his side against the cut backs in the 2nd half, prevented a lot of big plays by Ball. However he didn't do well in the hole in short yardage, it almost seemed like Bo flipped Whaley and Fish in these situations in the2nd half because I don't remember Fish being in the hole on those plays in the 2nd half.There is nothing to eat crow about. He made routine plays that he is supposed to make....big deal. He's still a liability.
He was a part of big plays. He didn't make big plays happen. There is a difference.He played with all the talent he has, can't ask for more than that, but your right he did do what he was supposed to do, just like the rest of the team. So no need in giving props to any of them, right... :confuciusThere is nothing to eat crow about. He made routine plays that he is supposed to make....big deal. He's still a liability.
GBR!!!