Sherman: Don't expect a lengthy search at Nebraska

[Igetbored216]

But don't argue against change because you're worried it might get worse.

This argument is tired. It's fun to talk about these things in the abstract, but we just fired a nine-win coach. This isn't some soap opera with make-believe characters, this is a huge employer with literally thousands of people depending on its continued success. Arguing against change for the sake of change makes perfect sense when you stand to lose millions of dollars in the process. At least, arguing for constraint in the decision-making makes sense.

If Eichorst doesn't have a splash lined up and he's winging this after Sunday morning, then we've just put a lot of things in jeopardy with the hope that it *might* get better. That's not a good gamble, and it could as easily backfire as succeed.

I don't think Eichorst did this, however. I think he's spent the last year getting himself ready for this circumstance and the "process" was all but concluded before he ever dismissed Pelini. I get the impression from Eichorst's presser that he has this firmly under control. THAT is what dictates your decision-making. The forethought and proper planning, the due diligence on candidates and more than handshake assurances that you have your guy, not some vague "it might get better."

Arguing that it might get worse is simple prudence. This is big-time college football. Edifices like Nebraska aren't built on "might."

I agree. The prepared statement he read was a little rough, but his intelligence and confidence really came through during the Q&A.

 

[Hunter94]

But don't argue against change because you're worried it might get worse.

This argument is tired. It's fun to talk about these things in the abstract, but we just fired a nine-win coach. This isn't some soap opera with make-believe characters, this is a huge employer with literally thousands of people depending on its continued success. Arguing against change for the sake of change makes perfect sense when you stand to lose millions of dollars in the process. At least, arguing for constraint in the decision-making makes sense.

If Eichorst doesn't have a splash lined up and he's winging this after Sunday morning, then we've just put a lot of things in jeopardy with the hope that it *might* get better. That's not a good gamble, and it could as easily backfire as succeed.

I don't think Eichorst did this, however. I think he's spent the last year getting himself ready for this circumstance and the "process" was all but concluded before he ever dismissed Pelini. I get the impression from Eichorst's presser that he has this firmly under control. THAT is what dictates your decision-making. The forethought and proper planning, the due diligence on candidates and more than handshake assurances that you have your guy, not some vague "it might get better."

Arguing that it might get worse is simple prudence. This is big-time college football. Edifices like Nebraska aren't built on "might."

could not agree more.......i think he most recognized the need to change the culture at NU.....i think Tressel was the man 6 months ago...or longer. and old sweater vest has already picked his OC and DC.......i would make book on it, Eichorist an intelligent AD.

 

[knapplc]

If the only definition of "improvement" is more than 9 wins, then you may be right. But frankly, if the next coach strings seven consecutive 9-3 seasons together, but manages to not alienate the fan base, media, or have too many blowout losses along the way, I will consider it "improvement."

I would agree, conditionally. Without question removing the wedge between the team and the fans would merit removing Bo on its own. That cannot be excused. I do think this move is made with the idea that we have a championship of some kind in the next 3-4 years, though. Even with the healed rift, 9-3 won't be accepted for very long.

@zoogies - I would argue there's a huge difference between 9-3 & 7-5. Had Bo strung four consecutive 7-5 seasons together at any time in his tenure, he'd have been gone. The perception of those numbers matter, even if the results aren't much different. There would be a LOT less second-guessing of firing a 7-5 Bo around the national media.