Should zoogs join the apostrophists?

Should zoogs join the 'postrophists?


  • Total voters
    29

zoogs

New member
Doing some investigatories, you guys. I've heard some things about these ' folk but I know you guys are the experts. What's the lowdown on them?

Results of the poll may be binding. This poll is not a nefarious attempt to compile member data.

 
Why join the ranks of the apostrophists? What of note has an apostrophist, any apostrophist, ever accomplished? What are their traits or tenets, what sets them apart or makes them noteworthy?

I have never heard of an apostrophysician. To my knowledge none of them know how to apply a band-aid, let alone cure a disease. There is no such thing as an apostrophysicist. No apostrophist has ever been involved in cutting edge science, or even likely knows what science is. They're dullards to a man. There are no apostrphysical therapists, curing the aches and pains of the suffering. There are no apostropharmers feeding the masses, or apostrophishermen risking life and limb to harvest the bounty of the sea.

Apostrophists stand for nothing, have no deeply-held beliefs. No Aposticism has been proffered to mankind, no Apostropharians have knocked on anyone's door, no great fount of wisdom has come from Apostroastrianism to lead the world.

Apostrophists are not admired outside their own ranks. There is no society of Apostrophiles expressing their love for all things apostrophysical.

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

This is not to say I denounce apostrophists. Certainly I do not. I merely pity their delusions, their attempt to be unique - just like everyone else.

 
Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

 
Why join the ranks of the apostrophists? What of note has an apostrophist, any apostrophist, ever accomplished? What are their traits or tenets, what sets them apart or makes them noteworthy?

I have never heard of an apostrophysician. To my knowledge none of them know how to apply a band-aid, let alone cure a disease. There is no such thing as an apostrophysicist. No apostrophist has ever been involved in cutting edge science, or even likely knows what science is. They're dullards to a man. There are no apostrphysical therapists, curing the aches and pains of the suffering. There are no apostropharmers feeding the masses, or apostrophishermen risking life and limb to harvest the bounty of the sea.

Apostrophists stand for nothing, have no deeply-held beliefs. No Aposticism has been proffered to mankind, no Apostropharians have knocked on anyone's door, no great fount of wisdom has come from Apostroastrianism to lead the world.

Apostrophists are not admired outside their own ranks. There is no society of Apostrophiles expressing their love for all things apostrophysical.

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

This is not to say I denounce apostrophists. Certainly I do not. I merely pity their delusions, their attempt to be unique - just like everyone else.
The jealousy is strong in this one.

 
Understandable why an apostrophist would want to characterize that accurate description thusly However, when we talk about the shortcomings of Colorado or Missouri, that isn't jealousy, it's recitation of facts. This was a recitation of facts, which aren't disputable.

 
Understandable why an apostrophist would want to characterize that accurate description thusly However, when we talk about the shortcomings of Colorado or Missouri, that isn't jealousy, it's recitation of facts. This was a recitation of facts, which aren't disputable.
no-answer.gif


 
Why join the ranks of the apostrophists? What of note has an apostrophist, any apostrophist, ever accomplished? What are their traits or tenets, what sets them apart or makes them noteworthy?

I have never heard of an apostrophysician. To my knowledge none of them know how to apply a band-aid, let alone cure a disease. There is no such thing as an apostrophysicist. No apostrophist has ever been involved in cutting edge science, or even likely knows what science is. They're dullards to a man. There are no apostrphysical therapists, curing the aches and pains of the suffering. There are no apostropharmers feeding the masses, or apostrophishermen risking life and limb to harvest the bounty of the sea.

Apostrophists stand for nothing, have no deeply-held beliefs. No Aposticism has been proffered to mankind, no Apostropharians have knocked on anyone's door, no great fount of wisdom has come from Apostroastrianism to lead the world.

Apostrophists are not admired outside their own ranks. There is no society of Apostrophiles expressing their love for all things apostrophysical.

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

This is not to say I denounce apostrophists. Certainly I do not. I merely pity their delusions, their attempt to be unique - just like everyone else.
Pure Gold.

 
Back
Top