Should zoogs join the apostrophists?

[NUance]

I suggest zoogies join the ranks of the random capitalizers instead. zOogiEs

sincerely,

nUanCe

 

[walksalone]

I suggest zoogies join the ranks of the random capitalizers instead. zOogiEs

sincerely,

nUanCe

Do that, so you can tell your kids that you and NUance we're on the ground floor of the capitalization movement...

 

[NUpolo8]

I suggest zoogies join the ranks of the random capitalizers instead. zOogiEs

sincerely,

nUanCe

Do that, so you can tell your kids that you and NUance we're on the ground floor of the capitalization movement...

Ahem.

 

[NUance]

I suggest zoogies join the ranks of the random capitalizers instead. zOogiEs

sincerely,

nUanCe

Do that, so you can tell your kids that you and NUance we're on the ground floor of the capitalization movement...

Ahem.

NUpolo8. What does your name even mean, anyway? Did you play polo at NU? [SIZE=13.63636302948px](perhaps in the year you graduated--your 8th year.) [/SIZE]Do you have eight NU polo shirts? Do you have polio, and apparently dyslexia too?

 

[NUpolo8]

You guessed it. I have dyslexic polio.

I never will limp again.

 

[Thanks_Tom RR]

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

Come on _Zoogs, live the underscore tradition. Apostrophism is a passing fade.

 

[Branno]

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

Come on _Zoogs, live the underscore tradition. Apostrophism is a passing fade.

Underscores are so 2010. Spaces are where it's at. Zoo Gies

 

[Thanks_Tom RR]

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

Come on _Zoogs, live the underscore tradition. Apostrophism is a passing fade.

Underscores are where it's at. Zoo_Gies

FIFY. Has it been so long Mo_Husker_Fan?

 

[Branno]

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

Come on _Zoogs, live the underscore tradition. Apostrophism is a passing fade.

Underscores are where it's at. Zoo_Gies

FIFY. Has it been soon long Mo_Husker_Fan?

Sadly, it took me until last year to make the change. I didn't realize the mistake I had made 4 years ago.

 

[Thanks_Tom RR]

Apostrophists are the Underliners of today. They are the Johnny-Come-Latelies of the punctuationally named. Which apostrophist couldn't be easily modified to comport to a more backward time? Is "sd'sker" markedly different than "sd_sker?" Or "Count 'Bility" much unlike "Count_Biliity?" I think not.

Come on _Zoogs, live the underscore tradition. Apostrophism is a passing fade.

Underscores are where it's at. Zoo_Gies

FIFY. Has it been soon long Mo_Husker_Fan?

Sadly, it took me until last year to make the change. I didn't realize the mistake I had made 4 years ago.

A classic never goes out of style.