LJSOf course, there is hope. But based on what I've heard, witnessed and reported for the past 14 seasons, Nebraska's return to elite status will be dependent largely on university leaders getting on the same page. I'm talking mostly about the head coach, athletic director, president, chancellor and regents.
Imagine Husker football with those folks pushing in the same direction. It perhaps seems difficult to fathom, it's been so rare. Too often since late 2002 — when Steve Pederson was hired as athletic director essentially to fire Frank Solich — there's been internal strife of some sort.
Here we go again.
Current Nebraska coach Mike Riley, athletic director Shawn Eichorst and lame-duck Chancellor Harvey Perlman are on the same page. But Perlman isn't exactly a popular figure with the regents, and it's no secret Eichorst has limited support among the upper-level administration — in part because he's created a stifling Pederson-esque corporate management structure.
It frankly gets old, all the politics.
People ask all the time: What's happened to Nebraska football? It's a gross oversimplification to point to only the coaching element. The downturn also has been the result of university leaders failing to maintain a strong overall vision for the program.
Since 2002, tumult has been present to a degree that once seemed unfathomable, with Perlman presiding all the while. He hasn't been the only problem, mind you, but he's been a common denominator. He has the unprecedented distinction of presiding over the firing of three football coaches. A fourth has Nebraska sitting at 3-6 — matching the Huskers' worst record through nine games since 1960.
Based on numerous interviews and conversations, it's clear upper-level university leadership once again lacks alignment and vision. So, once again, a Husker head coach must prepare for a formidable opponent while leadership above him weighs down the operation.
Last edited by a moderator: