Star Wars movies. Which trilogy should they be watched...

Cactusboy

Banned
in the cases when the person hasn't seen any. I got the blu-ray set and watched episodes 1 first...but I can't decide which order I would suggest to a friend that hasn'st seen any of them. There seem to be good reasons to start w/ 1 or 4...

Has anyone here seen ep 1 before the original trilogy??

 
If you watched the new movies first, then went back and watched the originals with their outdated special effects, even the remastered versions would look pretty bad. Better to watch them in order of special effects advances.

 
Even better to watch the original movies in order & then throw out the prequels.

 
If you watched the new movies first, then went back and watched the originals with their outdated special effects, even the remastered versions would look pretty bad. Better to watch them in order of special effects advances.
Those added effects drive me crazy. That and the revisionist history. In the updated episode 4, Greedo shoots first in the Mos Isley Cantina. In the original, Han blasts with Greedo failing to get a shot off.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watch the originals without the new effects first. Then watch the new ones. In order of release date is usually a best policy.

By the way, the revised effects actually make changes to the movies, as noted above. And some of them are very, very, very horrible. So don't do it!

 
If you watched the new movies first, then went back and watched the originals with their outdated special effects, even the remastered versions would look pretty bad. Better to watch them in order of special effects advances.
Those added effects drive me crazy. That and the revisionist history. In the updated episode 4, Greedo shoots first in the Mos Isley Cantina. In the original, Han blasts with Greedo failing to get a shot off.
Han shot first. The change was stupid.

 
I disagree strongly that the effects of IV-VI look outdated! Christopher Nolan has sorta brought scale modeling with minimal CGI back in style. The battle on Hoth in Empire, the speeder bikes in RoTJ, and the Death Star explosions stretched what was technically possible, but other than that I feel the effects are very good, and much more realistic when someone is actually on a set or sitting in a prop. Far too much of the prequils were filmed on white stages with full CGI backgrounds, and it just looks terrible outside of the space battles. Oh and, they forgot that a script or even a plot was a good idea for film too.

Anyway do what Muck said...watch the originals, forget the prequils ever happened.

 
Christopher Nolan has sorta brought scale modeling with minimal CGI back in style.
The dude that made the batman movies and inception? Yep that's the definition of mimimal cgi. BTW, I didn't know Micheal Bay was a member of huskerboard.

*as far as starwars, follow badger's avice*

I wish, the VHS "classic" trilogy wasn't the last orignal star wars I could buy.

That being said, funnily enough I just marathoned those movies a weekend or two ago.

start with the last three "a new hope," "the empire strikes back," and then "return of the jedi."

If you find Ewoks even slightly stupid throw the other movies away save for one part. The highlight of all 3 of the prequils was Darth Maul's light saber fight. As a simply stand alone light saber battle, it was pretty decent, and he was by far the best Sith mostly because of his light saber... Fast forward to that point (if it cuts to story, don't worry you didn't miss anything) watch that 5 minutes. Then follow badger's advice.

If you get through Jedi and actually like Ewoks. Do exactly the same thing I just said.

Seriously, there is no redeeming value in watching anything else in the prequels. I know, Ewan McGregor wasn't stinking the place up, but he's the only actor in them, seriously follow badger's advice.

If you watched them all, well repeat Anakin getting his arms and legs cut off by Obiwan until you can forget the whiny b!^@h he was for the previous three movies, and a couple extra to wipe the Jar-Jar taste out of your mouth, and again bin the first three movies. Then try not to throw up in rotj when the "ghosts" are the new actors.

Then download the family guy and robot chicken star wars trilogies and cleans yourself.

(on a side note why did Lucas screw up his own universe's cannon, Yoda was supposed to train Obi-wan, what-the hell man. it must have been in a book nobody read, like all of them, or something.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You have to watch them all! But I don't like how much CGI was used in the prequels. For example...Yoda and Chewie shouldn't have been made into CGI.

It probably is best to watch them in order of release, but I'm curious what I'd think if I went in fresh and started w/ the prequels... I do think part of the allure of Vader was not really knowing who he was...and then the surprise of learning he's Luke's dad...

 
You have to watch them all! But I don't like how much CGI was used in the prequels. For example...Yoda and Chewie shouldn't have been made into CGI.

It probably is best to watch them in order of release, but I'm curious what I'd think if I went in fresh and started w/ the prequels... I do think part of the allure of Vader was not really knowing who he was...and then the surprise of learning he's Luke's dad...
Yoda was definitely better as a Frank Oz puppet and Chewbacca was better originally too. However, if you've never seen the actual originals you haven't seen the whole thing being ruined by Lucas's love of CGI. They are different (better) films before the late 90s. Honestly. Not only does he just arbitrarily add scenes to get more CGI in which is completely obvious, but he layers cgi in existing scenes, adds scenes that change the movie, changes scenes that were in the movies, etc.

The southpark episode about Lucas and Spielburg raping Indiana Jones and Starwars wasn't a piece of fiction.

I haven't seen the originals in probably 15 years and I was still mentally picking out how scenes were different when I marathoned them over Christmas. They are just not the same films, sadly.

So I am going to stick with badgerfan, with the caveat that the darth maul light saber fight was badass (possibly because of the 2 hour buildup of "this has to get better" after seeing Star Wars in theaters for the first time in 20+ years) and the only thing that should survive from the "first" (by number) 3 films.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You have to watch them all! But I don't like how much CGI was used in the prequels. For example...Yoda and Chewie shouldn't have been made into CGI.

It probably is best to watch them in order of release, but I'm curious what I'd think if I went in fresh and started w/ the prequels... I do think part of the allure of Vader was not really knowing who he was...and then the surprise of learning he's Luke's dad...
Yoda was definitely better as a Frank Oz puppet and Chewbacca was better originally too. However, if you've never seen the actual originals you haven't seen the whole thing being ruined by Lucas's love of CGI. They are different (better) films before the late 90s. Honestly. Not only does he just arbitrarily add scenes to get more CGI in which is completely obvious, but he layers cgi in existing scenes, adds scenes that change the movie, changes scenes that were in the movies, etc.

The southpark episode about Lucas and Spielburg raping Indiana Jones and Starwars wasn't a piece of fiction.
I've seen the originals. I agree changing it so Solo didn't shoot first was a bad move, but were there any other parts that were changed? I don't mind how they added CGI in a few spots like the death star exploding. Although he for sure should have made it so you can watch either version on the blu-ray.

 
You have to watch them all! But I don't like how much CGI was used in the prequels. For example...Yoda and Chewie shouldn't have been made into CGI.

It probably is best to watch them in order of release, but I'm curious what I'd think if I went in fresh and started w/ the prequels... I do think part of the allure of Vader was not really knowing who he was...and then the surprise of learning he's Luke's dad...
Yoda was definitely better as a Frank Oz puppet and Chewbacca was better originally too. However, if you've never seen the actual originals you haven't seen the whole thing being ruined by Lucas's love of CGI. They are different (better) films before the late 90s. Honestly. Not only does he just arbitrarily add scenes to get more CGI in which is completely obvious, but he layers cgi in existing scenes, adds scenes that change the movie, changes scenes that were in the movies, etc.

The southpark episode about Lucas and Spielburg raping Indiana Jones and Starwars wasn't a piece of fiction.
I've seen the originals. I agree changing it so Solo didn't shoot first was a bad move, but were there any other parts that were changed? I don't mind how they added CGI in a few spots like the death star exploding. Although he for sure should have made it so you can watch either version on the blu-ray.
There were a few, and especially a few of the cuts to added scenes, just not having that old pace of the originals threw me off so I was ultra aware.

I mind the needless CGI, mostly the fake creatures added Jaba scenes expecially. I didn't mind explosions. and I completely agree, they should have included both versions. That'd be interesting.

I'm sure there's a few starwars sites out there with more comprehensive lists then I could ever do, so I'll defer to them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think there was some key Darth Vader stuff that was changed. Like when the Emperor is zapping the bajeezus out of Luke, Darth Vader starts going all "Nooooo...Nooooo."

 
Back
Top