Meyer has also coached at Bowling Green and Utah. 4 head coaching gigs, 0 "transition" years.So you're a Gator fan or Buckeye fan?Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
Meyer has also coached at Bowling Green and Utah. 4 head coaching gigs, 0 "transition" years.So you're a Gator fan or Buckeye fan?Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
Falcons fan eh?Meyer has also coached at Bowling Green and Utah. 4 head coaching gigs, 0 "transition" years.So you're a Gator fan or Buckeye fan?Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
Would have to agree. Honestly, not impressed with Riley initially, but he is really doing all the right things to get to winning IMO. I'm really hoping to see a continuation of the UCLA game. So far, that appears to be the direction we are going. At least this season. He's getting some great recruits. Has made some changes, seems to embrace the history and pageantry that is Husker football.Getting their recruits, their system, and players that want to be there gives me reason to chill for another season...maybe 2, before I hang my hat on a solid opinion. Until then, I'll have a fluid opinion and hang onto optimism.I am optimistic. For the simple fact this is year 2 in the system. They improved towards the end and some guys who "might" not have bought on are gone and those still here seem to now be on board. Player wise, we are passing the all important "eye ball" test.The issue isn't just that we had those last second losses.
A last second loss to Ohio State is worlds apart from a last second loss to Illinois.
Riley's "transition" year was a disaster.
Those are the reasons for me. The Huskers should never have to struggle with the like of Illinois, Purdue etc.... Never.
Belly G! Belly G!Meyer has also coached at Bowling Green and Utah. 4 head coaching gigs, 0 "transition" years.So you're a Gator fan or Buckeye fan?Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
Urban Meyer is a once in a lifetime coach that is extremely rare to find. Sorry to break it to you that Mike Riley isn't Urban Meyer, that Urban Meyer isn't coming here, and that chances are very poor for not just us, but for every school, that we're all going to miss out on the next Urban Meyer.Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
The issue isn't just that we had those last second losses.
A last second loss to Ohio State is worlds apart from a last second loss to Illinois.
Riley's "transition" year was a disaster.
He also had solid rosters at each school and he's probably the best coach in the country, maybe outside of Saban. Unfair to compare anything he's done to what is happening here.Meyer has also coached at Bowling Green and Utah. 4 head coaching gigs, 0 "transition" years.So you're a Gator fan or Buckeye fan?Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
and I would add to that.. These are not first year coaches, they have many years of coaching and STILL had these management issues. Doesn't bode well for the upcoming years.The issue isn't just that we had those last second losses.
A last second loss to Ohio State is worlds apart from a last second loss to Illinois.
Riley's "transition" year was a disaster.
Why even bring up Pelini? Seriously.Urban Meyer is a once in a lifetime coach that is extremely rare to find. Sorry to break it to you that Mike Riley isn't Urban Meyer, that Urban Meyer isn't coming here, and that chances are very poor for not just us, but for every school, that we're all going to miss out on the next Urban Meyer.Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
Pelini needed an Ameeracle to beat FCS McNeese State in year 7. Urban lost to a really lousy Va Tech team last year, and barely won by 1 against 6-6 Michigan the year before. It happens. It just so happened that our program had statistically improbable luck in those close call games the prior few years under Pelini, and the law of averages crashed down around Riley like a house of cards.The issue isn't just that we had those last second losses.
A last second loss to Ohio State is worlds apart from a last second loss to Illinois.
Riley's "transition" year was a disaster.
Why even bring up Pelini? Seriously.Urban Meyer is a once in a lifetime coach that is extremely rare to find. Sorry to break it to you that Mike Riley isn't Urban Meyer, that Urban Meyer isn't coming here, and that chances are very poor for not just us, but for every school, that we're all going to miss out on the next Urban Meyer.Urban Meyer's "system" seems to be just fine everywhere he goes. And immediately.
Pelini needed an Ameeracle to beat FCS McNeese State in year 7. Urban lost to a really lousy Va Tech team last year, and barely won by 1 against 6-6 Michigan the year before. It happens. It just so happened that our program had statistically improbable luck in those close call games the prior few years under Pelini, and the law of averages crashed down around Riley like a house of cards.The issue isn't just that we had those last second losses.
A last second loss to Ohio State is worlds apart from a last second loss to Illinois.
Riley's "transition" year was a disaster.
And there's no such thing as a "law of averages" in football. Though if you really want to argue that, you have to admit the average of 9.5 wins versus say a career .500 record.
Ed Oregon and Franklin aren't even good coaches.
I agree that many good coaches have struggled before. But rarely (ever?) has a national championship quality coach taken over a winning team and posted a losing first year record and later turned it around.
If Riley pulls it off, he may literally be the first.
For the record, plenty of games during the last 8 years could have gone NU's way and then NU had a CCG or two under its belt.
Point being, (a) I don't believe NU was unusually "lucky" under Bo, and (b) sometimes the hallmark of a great coach is winning more close games than you lose. That has nothing to do with "statistic probabilities."