What?Harbaugh would do a lot for the conference. With him the big ten west would be pretty solid with Mich, msu, and osu.
What?Harbaugh would do a lot for the conference. With him the big ten west would be pretty solid with Mich, msu, and osu.
Any North Koreans enrolled here?We could hack into the SEC teams' computers and... do stuff to them?The problem is the entire conference is located in a part of the country that has little to no elite talent. Plucking the kids from So Cal Texas and the Deep South is harder these days because our schools don't really have anything to sell them on, while having worse weather and being far from home.
Imo, it is a serious problem and no clear solution.
I don't get the no talent in the mid-west argument. It the gene pool different? The athletes are here, but maybe the high school football isn't as good, so the players need more development when they get to college.Depends what you mean by relevant. This conference has some of the blue blood programs with the highest attendance and the most amount of money. So the Big Ten will always be relevant from that point, having a good deal of say so at the bargaining tables.
In terms of on the field performance, I think it is a huge up hill battle. Urban seems to have figured it out, but we will really see where they stand on the national scene in a week or two here. The problem is the entire conference is located in a part of the country that has little to no elite talent. Plucking the kids from So Cal Texas and the Deep South is harder these days because our schools don't really have anything to sell them on, while having worse weather and being far from home.
Imo, it is a serious problem and no clear solution.
It's pretty obvious... the highly populated areas have a much larger number of talented athletes. One anomaly is New York, so obviously there are other factors (e.g. interest in college football?)I don't get the no talent in the mid-west argument. It the gene pool different? The athletes are here, but maybe the high school football isn't as good, so the players need more development when they get to college.Depends what you mean by relevant. This conference has some of the blue blood programs with the highest attendance and the most amount of money. So the Big Ten will always be relevant from that point, having a good deal of say so at the bargaining tables.
In terms of on the field performance, I think it is a huge up hill battle. Urban seems to have figured it out, but we will really see where they stand on the national scene in a week or two here. The problem is the entire conference is located in a part of the country that has little to no elite talent. Plucking the kids from So Cal Texas and the Deep South is harder these days because our schools don't really have anything to sell them on, while having worse weather and being far from home.
Imo, it is a serious problem and no clear solution.
Yeah, that's something I don't get. Same deal with people complaining about the new divisions and the West being so weak it will hurt our postseason chances. That seems like the cart is WAY before the horse there. Perhaps we should lose less than 4 games a year before we worry about getting screwed out of the playoffs.Don't talk sh#t on the B1G until we've dominated it.
Last time I checked, we've lost at least 2 conference games each year since we've joined.
I think it's been a good move for us. We're really thriving in basketball and it may have played a part in us changing our football program. Bo couldn't hack it in his old conference.
Ohio State has not won a NC in 11 years and they're working on their 4th top 5 recruiting class in a row. Not sure why a NC is needed for B1G recruiting.We need Ohio State to win right now. An NC game win or lose will bring more recruits into the conference, even some of those lesser teams may pick up a blue chip guy. B1G needs to win some bowl games too, that will help. If the Huskers pull off on Saturday that would be an extra good Christmas bonus!
And ESPN getting snubbed for the Big Ten Network.I believe the general thought of the Big 10 being a "lesser" or "down" conference of late has to do a lot with the media talking down about them. I never understood why ABC/ESPN would talk about the teams being down while airing the games at the same time, but I'm sure it has to do with the SEC/ESPN love tale to sell more people to buy the SEC Network. Besides the out of conference games, how can anyone really tell how strong a conference is, and it is not like the SEC is playing any tougher of out of conference games than any other conference.
Best talent pools for high school football have been for a long time, (not in order): California, Ohio, Texas, Florida, and Georgia.I don't get the no talent in the mid-west argument. It the gene pool different? The athletes are here, but maybe the high school football isn't as good, so the players need more development when they get to college.Depends what you mean by relevant. This conference has some of the blue blood programs with the highest attendance and the most amount of money. So the Big Ten will always be relevant from that point, having a good deal of say so at the bargaining tables.
In terms of on the field performance, I think it is a huge up hill battle. Urban seems to have figured it out, but we will really see where they stand on the national scene in a week or two here. The problem is the entire conference is located in a part of the country that has little to no elite talent. Plucking the kids from So Cal Texas and the Deep South is harder these days because our schools don't really have anything to sell them on, while having worse weather and being far from home.
Imo, it is a serious problem and no clear solution.
This is the key takeaway here. The proliferation of spring and summer 7 on 7 leagues in Texass and other southern states help build up those skill positions involved. And frankly, this is something that can be done by the northern schools and is slowly moving up north--I recall reading something a while ago where Nebraska is starting off-season 7 on 7 leagues for high school play.Why is population boom an important factor again?
The south has always had the most talent. Untalented retirees moving from NYC, Milwaukee, Buffalo, Detroit and Cleveland to Florida doesn't have much an effect. Those 60 something year olds don't have too much eligibility anyway.
Alabama has roughly the same population as Indiana. way more talent in Alabama. Southern HS football is taken much more seriously and spring practices are a big part of that as well as demographics(that aren't being affect by population migration too much)