This is... such an odd story.
LINK
To be honest, I'm in no way sad to see this account blow up like this (even though some people think it's a hoax). Although they often provided a modicum of entertainment, and could be seen as a public safety tool, the last couple of months are not the first time the account made questionable decisions. I stopped following them two years ago because they would routinely pick childish fights with local journalists and then hide behind their anonymity.
There's also something to be said about relying on trained professionals for information versus a handful of anonymous people listening to police scanners 24/7. The article referenced one instance of them releasing information that could've put officers at risk but there were others.
I know some of the contributors and they're not bad people, so I do feel bummed for them, but I'm otherwise not disappointed.
LINK
Twitter was abuzz Tuesday after MeanStreets Omaha, a popular social media account, lost all of its contributors in the wake of racist and expletive-ridden tweets over the last few weeks.
Seven people who anonymously wrote posts or took photos for MeanStreets — known for tweeting “death, destruction and funny stuff from the streets of Omaha” — have cut ties with the creator, citing differences over “content and message.” All revealed their identities — some in letters in a tweet before their access was taken away, but that tweet has now been deleted.
To be honest, I'm in no way sad to see this account blow up like this (even though some people think it's a hoax). Although they often provided a modicum of entertainment, and could be seen as a public safety tool, the last couple of months are not the first time the account made questionable decisions. I stopped following them two years ago because they would routinely pick childish fights with local journalists and then hide behind their anonymity.
There's also something to be said about relying on trained professionals for information versus a handful of anonymous people listening to police scanners 24/7. The article referenced one instance of them releasing information that could've put officers at risk but there were others.
I know some of the contributors and they're not bad people, so I do feel bummed for them, but I'm otherwise not disappointed.
Last edited by a moderator: