Nebraska offensive coordinator Shawn Watson says an offense evolves during the course of a season.
In what ways might the Huskers’ offense evolve now in the wake of Rex Burkhead’s foot injury, Roy Helu’s aching right shoulder and an increasing awareness that Big Red might have an ordinary offensive line and set of wideouts?
Can Ndamukong Suh play on offense again?
The 15th-ranked Huskers are 4-1 and suddenly regarded nationally as exciting up-and-comers. In Huskerville, meanwhile, folks seem uneasy, if not a tad testy. For instance, wolves are still howling over Watson’s play-calling in last week’s win at Missouri. Questions abound.
A few answers arrived Tuesday.
“Missouri brought a lot of run pressures, just to get guys in gaps,” Nebraska quarterback Zac Lee said in reference to Watson’s decision to eschew the run game much of the time Thursday night despite driving rain.
Give Mizzou credit. Its game plan was to give Nebraska the outside passing lanes, a wise defensive strategy considering the conditions.
“They kind of loaded the middle of the field,” Lee said. “But no matter what the conditions, we have to take what the defense gives us.”
You want a definition of Nebraska’s offensive identity? There it is. Take what the defense gives you. Can Husker fans ever get used to that? Just asking, because you seldom feel this much tension in the air after such a significant and hard-fought triumph.
Nebraska head coach Bo Pelini gave a one-word answer last month when asked to describe the Huskers’ offense: multiple. In that regard, NU possesses the ability to adapt, which is nice, but causes identity confusion at times.
Identity confusion obviously wasn’t an issue for those great Husker teams of the 1990s. They would punish with their ground game, rain or shine.
Given the soggy conditions at Missouri, Watson’s plan seemed to defy logic. Nebraska passed 22 times in the first half and ran 13 times.
But raw data can be somewhat deceiving. Watson pointed out Tuesday that of those 35 first-half play calls, 21 were designed runs.
“And then we had run-pass checks with them,” he said. “If they loaded up the box, then we can use a pass play to get us out of that loaded look and take advantage of the structure of the defense.”
Stacked box or not, most Big Red fans want to see commitment to the run.
However, “You can only run into a loaded front so much,” Watson said. “Pretty soon that becomes defeating.”
“You do what it takes to win games,” he added. “That’s how we’ve built ourselves. We know what it takes to win games in our league. You’re going to face defenses that want to load up the box. You have to be able to throw to win in those situations.”
The thing is, Watson does express a big-picture commitment to the run. He has long told me a fundamental tenet guides him: You better be able to run the ball well, period. He believes that’s how championships are won. His six years at Colorado (2000-05) — which included four Big 12 North Division crowns and a league title — suggest he knows something about play-calling.
It should be noted he’s experienced years in which he had to use the passing game to set up the run. Perhaps this will be one of those years. It’ll be interesting to monitor how this offense evolves.
It’s evolving, all right.
In its glory years, Nebraska often had a loaded stable of running backs. Now the Huskers have a wounded starter in Helu and a bunch of unproven youngsters. Would it make sense now to pound the rock all day long, rain or shine? Or might it be better to be good at a lot of things?
Hey, just asking.