Harold W. Andersen: Critics of Huskers should note newer players, improved defense
BY HAROLD W. ANDERSEN
WORLD-HERALD CONTRIBUTING EDITOR
With some followers of University of Nebraska football seeing red these days (definitely not the "Go Big Red" variety and definitely including multiple critics in the journalistic fraternity), let's try to bring some balance to the discussion of the Huskers' 3-0 performance to date in this second season under Coach Bill Callahan.
One of the most outspoken critics neglected to mention injuries to three veteran pass receivers and one promising freshman. Also unmentioned was the remarkable improvement in the Husker defense - at least in the three games to date. Head coaches and their staffs are responsible for developing defenses, too, you know.
Also little noted by the critics is the fact that this is the first year - not the second - under the tutelage of Callahan and his staff for 19 freshmen (not including redshirts) and junior-college transfers who this year are seeing their first Husker playing time.
It's perhaps time to repeat some sound advice from, of all places, the Denver Post. Early in 2003, sportswriter Bill Briggs examined the time it took five football powers to climb into the Associated Press' Top 5 after a "falloff" season - for Texas, 15 years; Ohio State, eight years; Alabama, seven years; Notre Dame, eight years.
For Oklahoma, after failing to make the AP Top 25 in 1992, it took the Sooners eight seasons to climb back, including three consecutive losing seasons, followed by an unranked 7-5 season in '99 and a national championship in 2000. The Post columnist's comments ended on an upbeat note for Nebraska which, he said, has "a brawny foundation on which to rebuild."
* * *