Did SouthLincoln Husker just reply to himself????He is a D2 trying to play D1.Ryker is #2 & he is terrible.Our backup QB's couldn't be a third stringer on any other team in the Big Ten? Did I just read that right?
Where do people come up with this stuff?
Just adding to why I feel this way. I have been watch him play since HS and have seen very little improvement. The kid has character & grit, but if Tommy gets hurt we have little backup choices. If Ryker is #2, the 2 RFr are not ready to step up yet.Did SouthLincoln Husker just reply to himself????He is a D2 trying to play D1.Ryker is #2 & he is terrible.Our backup QB's couldn't be a third stringer on any other team in the Big Ten? Did I just read that right?
Where do people come up with this stuff?
Regardless of whether that's true or not, he IS the likely back up. It doesn't mean he's the most talented - it likely just means he's the most reliable, comfortable option the coaches have back there. This "D2" player has proven himself over all these coveted younger QB's and you're insulting the kid. Is that really necessary?He is a D2 trying to play D1.Ryker is #2 & he is terrible.Our backup QB's couldn't be a third stringer on any other team in the Big Ten? Did I just read that right?
Where do people come up with this stuff?
We place a different value on experience and familiarity. I'm fine with that.
I think it's pretty valuable. That fact that a lot of those guys have very few receptions in games make me wonder how it will go when they get out there. Combinethe lack of familiarity and experience at WR with a coaching transition and a new offensive system, and I think this is an issue that will show itself during games.
While you'd certainly like more experienced veterans in your group, we're not exactly depraved of experience.
Burtch, Reilly, Hovey, Allen and Jamal all have plenty of live game experience against quality teams. Obviously Westy is the number one guy, and Stanley Morgan looks to be pushing for an inevitable role as a contributor as a true frosh, and you've got a solid 7 guys with varying degrees of experience, but with experience nonetheless. We've also got two solid tight ends that have plenty of experience under the lights.
I think individual great players matter way less than mental toughness on great teams. I'm certain the sky had completely fallen on OSU fans when Braxton was out for the season, and then again when Barrett went down against Michigan.
Who says it's not important? My comments were based on the choice of words "Deck stacked against them". Those four words really don't pertain to this.We place a different value on experience and familiarity. I'm fine with that.
I think it's pretty valuable. That fact that a lot of those guys have very few receptions in games make me wonder how it will go when they get out there. Combinethe lack of familiarity and experience at WR with a coaching transition and a new offensive system, and I think this is an issue that will show itself during games.
While you'd certainly like more experienced veterans in your group, we're not exactly depraved of experience.
Burtch, Reilly, Hovey, Allen and Jamal all have plenty of live game experience against quality teams. Obviously Westy is the number one guy, and Stanley Morgan looks to be pushing for an inevitable role as a contributor as a true frosh, and you've got a solid 7 guys with varying degrees of experience, but with experience nonetheless. We've also got two solid tight ends that have plenty of experience under the lights.
I think individual great players matter way less than mental toughness on great teams. I'm certain the sky had completely fallen on OSU fans when Braxton was out for the season, and then again when Barrett went down against Michigan.![]()
One play BrB and LOMS. One play destroyed any chance we had of defeating the #5 team in the country in the AP final poll. Two inexperienced WR's.
There will be plays like this in the future and we can only hope they don't impact the entire program like this single play did last year. We make this play, continue this drive, and score a touchdown, and Bo Pelini is still the HC at Nebraska.
Seeing True's post listing the receivers who are gone made me wonder just how many guys we have left who can catch the ball. Turns out we have 28 WRs and TEs on the rosters. 28! Sure, that includes a lot of practice players who won't likely ever see the field. But holy crap, 28! That's a lot.The deck is not stacked against these guys. Every team loses major contributors every year. We had a good team last year (not great and not to the level we strive for, but good). I see no reason why we won't have a good team this year with the chance of improvement on that. It's not like the guys you listed have never played football before. They are here because they are very good athletes and are good at what they do.True2tRA said:KB - gone
AA - gone
DPE - gone 6-8 weeks
JW - 13 games played 44 receptions last year
JT - 2 games played- 4 receptions last year
BR - 7 games played - 6 receptions last year
AM - 11 games played - 10 receptions
TA - 12 games played - 8 receptions
LH - 12 games played - 5 receptions
CC - 9 games played - 6 receptions
SC - 13 games played - 3 receptions
Here I am making excuses for Tommy before the season even starts. That's what some will say. Facts are facts. If Tommy overcomes the odds to be successful this season, it will be a credit to him and to this coaching staff, and these inexperienced WR's, because right now the deck is stacked against these guys.
Yeah, I was shocked that there's that many. I mean, how many have more than a handful of receptions during the season. Maybe 8 or 10? Fewer?28 WR's and TE's! Minus Jordan Westerkamp's 44 catches and DPE for 6-8 weeks, there's 53 combined receptions made by any other WR or TE last season, that will be on the roster this year.
So 53 total receptions last year made by the entire WR and TE roster not named Westerkamp and DPE.
Geez that's like an average of 2 receptions per WR/TE! Gah! What is anyone so worried about? That's plenty.
Give me JW, Enunwa, DPE, and KB back this season and you can have all 26 of those other guys.Yeah, I was shocked that there's that many. I mean, how many have more than a handful of receptions during the season. Maybe 8 or 10? Fewer?28 WR's and TE's! Minus Jordan Westerkamp's 44 catches and DPE for 6-8 weeks, there's 53 combined receptions made by any other WR or TE last season, that will be on the roster this year.
So 53 total receptions last year made by the entire WR and TE roster not named Westerkamp and DPE.
Geez that's like an average of 2 receptions per WR/TE! Gah! What is anyone so worried about? That's plenty.
I would trade half a dozen of those guys for one Kenny Bell or Quincy Enunwa.