Landlord
Banned
We're now seven games into Tommy's sophomore year being the unquestioned guy. Career he's 13-2 as our starter, and this season so far 6-1. So what's your halfway point grade out of his performance?
I teeter between C+/B-. He's a difficult read for me. He isn't unlike a past Tommie with his confidence and mojo, which anyone that has played sports knows definitely matters in a leader. He looks the part to anyone that watches.
The Good
- Those deep balls. I'd love to see a scientific study on what actually makes a quarterback able to throw deep balls so great, and think Tommy could be a good candidate for research because he puts them absolutely on the money. Even if you negate the actual benefits to our offensive production, you can't deny that the offense has been a lot of fun to watch because of those beauties.
- Lack of turnovers. He's still got some room for good growth in this area, but overall Tommy is taking care of the ball well, and whether or not it's related to him being the quarterback, the team is taking care of the ball pretty well also. The Michigan State game is an outlier, but two of his turnovers are as understandable as turnovers can be, one being a fumble due to poor protection (that I don't think should have been ruled a fumble), and the other an interception trying to cap off a furious and near-miraculous comeback.
- Running ability. Tommy isn't a blazer, but I think the greatest mental part of his game thus far is his ability to pick his spots and know when to keep the ball. He doesn't make the explosive running plays (at least not AS explosive as we're used to), but he sure makes incredibly efficient ones. Most of his runs seem to go for 8-15 yards, but every one of them seems like he's running wide open because he or the coaches picked the perfect time to keep the ball in his hands when the defense started keying on Abdullah.
- The wins. We're winning, and at the end of the day I don't care how ugly or pretty it is.
The Bad
- Headscratcher throws. He still hasn't shaken the "let's just chuck one down field under pressure for fun" throws that are 30 yards away from any player and seem to pop up at least once per game. Seems like a few times per game he makes throws that just don't seem to be to anyone or don't seem to be executed the way they were drawn up. Likely blame that on not being on the same page with his receivers in reading defenders and adjusting, but hopefully that will improve with time.
- Short throw accuracy. For as good as Tommy is at drilling the ball as a laser at times, especially deep, it baffles the mind how much he can struggle with the elementary throws sometimes. Ameer likely would have gone for a touchdown if Tommy gets him the ball on that RB screen Saturday, and there were a number of bubble screens to Westerkamp and the receivers that would have gotten yards but he missed the throws. I think he's capable of more and fully expect him to shore this up, and while it's understandable in some respects, it's definitely frustrating as well.
- Passing efficiency. I go back and forth on this one. On one hand, he seems to be lights out on 3rd down, and somehow even on 3rd and long, and on the other it seems like he is contributing just as much as anyone else to the reasons why we find ourselves in 3rd and long. What's interesting to me is that a large number of us are defending his numbers with the idea that completion percentage doesn't matter. I get the reasoning, but in the four years before he started, I can't recall ever hearing that argument one time, but hearing a lot of excitement over improved completion percentage. Anecdotal evidence to be sure, but I find it interesting and I'm also one that thinks completion percentage does matter, insofar as it reveals how efficient a quarterback is at what he's being asked to do. This might fall partially on the coaches, this might fall on youth which is an excuse that is running out of time, or it might just be a shortcoming in a human that isn't perfect. I don't think he has performed badly, but I think he still has a lot of room for potential.
Your turn.
I teeter between C+/B-. He's a difficult read for me. He isn't unlike a past Tommie with his confidence and mojo, which anyone that has played sports knows definitely matters in a leader. He looks the part to anyone that watches.
The Good
- Those deep balls. I'd love to see a scientific study on what actually makes a quarterback able to throw deep balls so great, and think Tommy could be a good candidate for research because he puts them absolutely on the money. Even if you negate the actual benefits to our offensive production, you can't deny that the offense has been a lot of fun to watch because of those beauties.
- Lack of turnovers. He's still got some room for good growth in this area, but overall Tommy is taking care of the ball well, and whether or not it's related to him being the quarterback, the team is taking care of the ball pretty well also. The Michigan State game is an outlier, but two of his turnovers are as understandable as turnovers can be, one being a fumble due to poor protection (that I don't think should have been ruled a fumble), and the other an interception trying to cap off a furious and near-miraculous comeback.
- Running ability. Tommy isn't a blazer, but I think the greatest mental part of his game thus far is his ability to pick his spots and know when to keep the ball. He doesn't make the explosive running plays (at least not AS explosive as we're used to), but he sure makes incredibly efficient ones. Most of his runs seem to go for 8-15 yards, but every one of them seems like he's running wide open because he or the coaches picked the perfect time to keep the ball in his hands when the defense started keying on Abdullah.
- The wins. We're winning, and at the end of the day I don't care how ugly or pretty it is.
The Bad
- Headscratcher throws. He still hasn't shaken the "let's just chuck one down field under pressure for fun" throws that are 30 yards away from any player and seem to pop up at least once per game. Seems like a few times per game he makes throws that just don't seem to be to anyone or don't seem to be executed the way they were drawn up. Likely blame that on not being on the same page with his receivers in reading defenders and adjusting, but hopefully that will improve with time.
- Short throw accuracy. For as good as Tommy is at drilling the ball as a laser at times, especially deep, it baffles the mind how much he can struggle with the elementary throws sometimes. Ameer likely would have gone for a touchdown if Tommy gets him the ball on that RB screen Saturday, and there were a number of bubble screens to Westerkamp and the receivers that would have gotten yards but he missed the throws. I think he's capable of more and fully expect him to shore this up, and while it's understandable in some respects, it's definitely frustrating as well.
- Passing efficiency. I go back and forth on this one. On one hand, he seems to be lights out on 3rd down, and somehow even on 3rd and long, and on the other it seems like he is contributing just as much as anyone else to the reasons why we find ourselves in 3rd and long. What's interesting to me is that a large number of us are defending his numbers with the idea that completion percentage doesn't matter. I get the reasoning, but in the four years before he started, I can't recall ever hearing that argument one time, but hearing a lot of excitement over improved completion percentage. Anecdotal evidence to be sure, but I find it interesting and I'm also one that thinks completion percentage does matter, insofar as it reveals how efficient a quarterback is at what he's being asked to do. This might fall partially on the coaches, this might fall on youth which is an excuse that is running out of time, or it might just be a shortcoming in a human that isn't perfect. I don't think he has performed badly, but I think he still has a lot of room for potential.
Your turn.