14 teams and if you notice 2-3 players on the list weren't even starters(was Wilbon a starter?) so 5th out of 30-40 players isn't badSo he's 5th in a league with 12 teams and he is not even close to the #1 guy. That said our entire team was so poorly utilized and coached I'm in bring me the kool-aide while I wait for the party to start mode.
I never add enough team teams to Big 10, it will help me out if we excluded team east of State College.14 teams and if you notice 2-3 players on the list weren't even starters(was Wilbon a starter?) so 5th out of 30-40 players isn't bad
I really did think Wilbon was our best runner last year. Bryant is the more complete back but with the ball in his hands, Wilbon can do things.
Our RB rotation will be interesting to watch this year. I'm not holding my breath on Bryant but he, Wilbon and Bell is a nice trio to have.
Agree. I also feel the running lanes the scheme will produce will benefit him a bit imo. Think Bradley could be a factor too.
68 missed tackles on 307 touches is about 20% though that isn't perfect because he could have more than one on any given touch but still pretty remarkableHere's total touches if anyone was wondering:
- Taylor = 307
- Larkin = 95
- Evans = 151
- Knox = 105
- Jones = 126
- Wilbon = 109
99.9% on 307 touches would blow my mind if I hadn't watched the games
I haven’t been impressed with our current group of running backs. The problem is that we could have 20-year old clones of Emmitt Smith, Barry Sanders, and Jim Brown on the roster and Riley and Co. would have made them look mediocre through crappy player development, terrible blocking, clueless playcalling, and a general inability to use resources effectively.
We’ll just have to wait and see.