I've only been in brief contact with iPhones before. They're cool, well-designed, nice phones. You can count on Apple to make some pretty neat hardware, IMO. However, it wasn't
that amazing, or anything. Apart from having the internet at my fingertips - something any smart phone gives you - it didn't inspire any awe in me. Which is fine, I don't really expect a phone to. Well, maybe unless it costs as much as an iPhone...
The thing with a lot of these Apple products though, is the software platform. Apple is pretty notorious I think for "locking you in" - very limited customization, very rigid/inflexible ways for how things work. If you say, "But I want to customize/configure it this way!" the answer is typically "But why would you ever want that?! Also, screw you. *Thwack!*"
That's my uninformed, limited impression, anyway. I think I have more faith in Android (or Windows) for being a powerful, flexible platform where I can dig in and make the phone/tablet "my own", whereas the iPhone will have slick aesthetics but I'd just have to deal with how it's designed to work, as is.
The Samsung Galaxy S3 is a much better slower phone.
FIFY.
http://gizmodo.com/5...the-competition
(Seriously though . . . buy whatever phone you like sd'sker.

)
By the way, this is completely misleading if you want to apply that "FIFY" in there, because it says nothing about the operation of the phone itself, only the
javascript performance according to one benchmark of the
stock browser.
I wouldn't be too shocked if you were locked in to the stock browser on the iPhone, but for the others, I'm assuming you can go ahead and get another browser of your choice, with ease. So it would on the whole, be a pretty minor concern. Although I'm mildly surprised by the results, because I don't have good impressions of Safari's performance, at all.