The Penalties are under further review

IAHUSKERS1

IAHUSKERS1

Three-Star Recruit
The title says it all, makes me wonder how some of our games would have turned out the if the penalties could be reviewed like some of the plays.

 
The 3 big PI call were legit in my eyes. Guys had there back arm wrapped. If seen , it gets called every time. The one on Evans was pretty easy to call. The one big one was the PF on Stafford when it was obvious he was pushed into the qb. That was a changer because we had stopped them to a FG attempt. Horrible.

 
accountability said:
The 3 big PI call were legit in my eyes. Guys had there back arm wrapped. If seen , it gets called every time. The one on Evans was pretty easy to call. The one big one was the PF on Stafford when it was obvious he was pushed into the qb. That was a changer because we had stopped them to a FG attempt. Horrible.
Click to expand...
Big time. It just seems that these officials are 1 second behind the play. Most of us saw the shove on Stafford. What were they looking at?

 
You see the PI play not get called to. They were calling it really tight on our DBs. They were calling things really close all game.

 
accountability said:
The 3 big PI call were legit in my eyes. Guys had there back arm wrapped. If seen , it gets called every time. The one on Evans was pretty easy to call. The one big one was the PF on Stafford when it was obvious he was pushed into the qb. That was a changer because we had stopped them to a FG attempt. Horrible.
Click to expand...
Isn't that how you're taught to do it in the NFL?

 
I do agree on the PI calls and a few others, the call that got me fired up, was the call when our player got pushed out of bounds and he had his hands up as to say no harm, I am just voicing some of my frustration out in words, but since we won today I am good.

 
The Red & White Knight said:
accountability said:
The 3 big PI call were legit in my eyes. Guys had there back arm wrapped. If seen , it gets called every time. The one on Evans was pretty easy to call. The one big one was the PF on Stafford when it was obvious he was pushed into the qb. That was a changer because we had stopped them to a FG attempt. Horrible.
Click to expand...
Isn't that how you're taught to do it in the NFL?
Click to expand...
Here's my view:

You can have your arm wrapped as long as you aren't putting force on the receiver with it. The one on Evans was iffy, but IMO, the other two were total BS.

 
B1G officials are awful!!! At least they are awful in both directions.

Those PI's were iffy at best, the call on Stafford out of bounds was BS. Sparty PI also iffy. Sparty PF for hitting up high also baffling.

 
macroboy said:
B1G officials are awful!!! At least they are awful in both directions.

Those PI's were iffy at best, the call on Stafford out of bounds was BS. Sparty PI also iffy. Sparty PF for hitting up high also baffling.
Click to expand...
I'm with you on this, but Martinez got hit in the chin right under the face mask after he threw the ball. There was a lot of movement in the helmet, and that's why it was called.

 
whateveritis1224 said:
macroboy said:
B1G officials are awful!!! At least they are awful in both directions.

Those PI's were iffy at best, the call on Stafford out of bounds was BS. Sparty PI also iffy. Sparty PF for hitting up high also baffling.
Click to expand...
I'm with you on this, but Martinez got hit in the chin right under the face mask after he threw the ball. There was a lot of movement in the helmet, and that's why it was called.
Click to expand...
They've been EXTREMELY consistent on calling contact anywhere near the helmet for the entire year, as many of us remember. I'm still fuming over the personal foul called on Stafford when he got pushed in the back.

 
I would totally like to see them crack down on pick plays and let the corners and safetys play a little way to many teams are being bailed out on third and long because of iffy pass interference calls and then to many big plays are coming on designed offensive pass interference that is not being called

 
I think the pass interference penalty has evolved too much away from what the rule actually is. The officials have become too respondent to just contact that they are failing to interpret whether or not the contact is actually impeding the receiver's ability to catch the ball. Hence, the two PI's on us with the arm hooked could be seen as bs. But I thought the one on Evans in the first quarter was legit. I thought he did enough to impede the receiver's chance at getting to the ball with contact. I think the same of the PI in the endzone at the end on Dennard. I thought his contact legitimately impeded Bell's ablility to catch the ball.

 
accountability said:
I think the pass interference penalty has evolved too much away from what the rule actually is.  The officials have become too respondent to just contact that they are failing to interpret whether or not the contact is actually impeding the receiver's ability to catch the ball.  Hence, the two PI's on us with the arm hooked could be seen as bs.  But I thought the one on Evans in the first quarter was legit. I thought he did enough to impede the receiver's chance at getting to the ball with contact.  I think the same of the PI in the endzone at the end on Dennard.  I thought his contact legitimately impeded Bell's ablility to catch the ball.
Click to expand...
Yes i agree with you that if the defender is preventing the receiver from making a play on the ball it should pass interference. The way football has evolved into such a sophisticated passing game I hope that the competition committee takes a look at this in the off season, and makes it more like the pro game where the defender has a right to the ball too when it is in the air instead of the way it is now.

 
On Final Drive on the BTN they had a still picture of the Adams personal foul on the INT return. Anyone have a link to that or any other video/picture of it?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top