Spooky Tooth
Special Teams Player
:funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah :funnyhahah
My apologiesDo these guys play any particular positions?
With the current state of Iowa football, do you think Wisnieski could be an option if, god forbid, Sandland doesn't pick NU?Wisnieski would be N if the staff hadn't slow played him. As it is, I think the staff is happy with the HS player currently verballed and a JUCO TE. If the staff swings and misses on the JUCO, I don't think they take another HS TE.
We rejected Wisnieski's commitment, FYI sourceHedley Lamarr said:I would love to have,
Delano Hill Rivals 4 star
Ht 6 foot
Wt 198
40. 4.44
John Wisnieski Rivals 3 star
Ht 6'5
Wt 215
40 4.8
Colin Goebel Rivals 3 star
Ht 6'4
Wt 275
40 5.0
Malik Rucker Rivals 3 star
Ht 6 foot
Wt 175
40 4.48
These would all be needs in our current class and currently are as good as we would get.
PS Gotta love Ruckers hair
We will probably take Casey Sayles reguardless.Wisnieski would be N if the staff hadn't slow played him. As it is, I think the staff is happy with the HS player currently verballed and a JUCO TE. If the staff swings and misses on the JUCO, I don't think they take another HS TE.
I am going to disagree....RSS is full of poo and rose colored glasses. Never get the full picture just the parts that make NU look good. The kid is a solid TE that needs a college weightroom. IMO he and Hart would be a good combo.We rejected Wisnieski's commitment, FYI sourceHedley Lamarr said:I would love to have,
Delano Hill Rivals 4 star
Ht 6 foot
Wt 198
40. 4.44
John Wisnieski Rivals 3 star
Ht 6'5
Wt 215
40 4.8
Colin Goebel Rivals 3 star
Ht 6'4
Wt 275
40 5.0
Malik Rucker Rivals 3 star
Ht 6 foot
Wt 175
40 4.48
These would all be needs in our current class and currently are as good as we would get.
PS Gotta love Ruckers hair
Disagree with you saying they are as good as we would get.Hedley Lamarr said:I would love to have,Delano Hill Rivals 4 star
Ht 6 foot
Wt 198
40. 4.44
John Wisnieski Rivals 3 star
Ht 6'5
Wt 215
40 4.8
Colin Goebel Rivals 3 star
Ht 6'4
Wt 275
40 5.0
Malik Rucker Rivals 3 star
Ht 6 foot
Wt 175
40 4.48
These would all be needs in our current class and currently are as good as we would get.
PS Gotta love Ruckers hair
Boaz is a safety target as well as a cb. Boaz is head and shoulders the better athlete. Really like the mean streak and the athleticism of Boaz. He Is very raw yet, but we can afford to take a kid like that with our depth in the secondary. It doesn't appear we have another TE target and it appears the staff is content with that.What other safety targets are on our radar? I have heard of some dang good CB prospects but not much on the Safety slots. In terms of another TE not named Sandland I think Wisnieski is about as good as we have left on the board. Goebel like you already said would be a nice addition to a depthless OL