irafreak
All-American
Let's not forget the LP phiasco of 95 that could've derailed this team. I put the stats on a CBS article touting "how could anyone argue against bama being the best dynasty ever"....simply put, most of the key reasons have already been mentioned...but to add on....we never lost at home during that 4 year run (didn't even lose at home the two years prior), had 7 shutouts, beat 4 teams in 95 that FINISHED in the top 10, 2 in 94 and it should also be emphasized that counting us we had 4 teams from our conference finish in the top 10...so it could be argued that the Big 8 equalled the mighty sec in competitive balance...Nexus said:Make no mistake, if Bama beats ND, it'll be quite an accomplishment. However, what gets overlooked and this article indirectly mentions it without going into further detail, is that our 2nd string QB (who wasn't 100% healthy himself) was responsible for winning 60% of those games as a starter during that undefeated '94 title run. How many teams can say they won a national title on the back of their 2nd string QB for 60% of the season? Let alone having to start their 3rd string walk-on QB on the road against an undefeated (16th AP/11th Coaches) KSU? Also let the record show that our 2nd string QB beat (2nd AP/3rd Coaches) ranked Colorado, when national pundits were CERTAIN we'd lose that game because of our 2nd string QB. Some had the audacity to say even if Frazier was healthy for that game, we'd still lose. Yet our beloved 2nd stringer came through looking like an NFL QB that day and the rest is history.
But seriously, the most impressive part of that 90s run, IMO, is the '94 season due to the setback @ QB and the fact that our undefeated season relied heavily on our 2nd and 3rd string QB in key games. Quite unheard of in college football history. That'll always be what makes NU's dynasty run in the 90s unique.
Last edited by a moderator: