Curtis Cotton, as already mentioned was a testing phenom and great athlete. Never really excelled otherwise. He was definitely a contributer on the team, but his testing numbers didn't translate to the field. Kenzo may be the same thing. It is a tough call. Not all great athletes are great football players. I have run across it many times in my coaching days.
Look, every single kid on the team is an athlete and probably one of the top 3 best players at their respective school. EVERYONE is an athlete and not great until they prove it. Kenzo is no different. There are always highly rated and athletically gifted players that come in and they lack the mental side of things to get onto the field. It happens. Will it happen here? If I listened to many people posting in this thread...then Kenzo shouldn't even try because he's already no good at football.
Of course, people aren't even thinking of things like:
- Is it his dream to play for the Huskers? If so, he'll have the drive to succeed like most in state talent does
- Does he possess intangibles? (effort, desire, determination, competitiveness, leadership, ball awareness, etc?)
- What is his ability to learn? Anyone know what his ACT/SAT scores were? (this is the biggest indicator of success if he has the athletic ability already)
Bottom line is...we don't know jack squat about him other than he's very fast, has good field vision, makes good open field tackles, and has good body position when he's in the air on a jump (all from his video). Those things alone tell me that he's worth the offer...but of course, people here absolutely know he should just concentrate on track and field and forget football.
Come on people...use your brain a bit and give the benefit of doubt before outright dismissal.