Coqui
Starter
Just because you've never won there doesn't mean it sucks.BUT ZOMG THE ROSE BOWL IS THE MOAST BEST BOWL

Just because you've never won there doesn't mean it sucks.BUT ZOMG THE ROSE BOWL IS THE MOAST BEST BOWL
How many of those Rose Bowls has the Big 10 won in the last 10 years?Just because you've never won there doesn't mean it sucks.BUT ZOMG THE ROSE BOWL IS THE MOAST BEST BOWL![]()
My team has won the last two times its been there. Good enough for me. Either way, that's why we can't trust Wisconsin.How many of those Rose Bowls has the Big 10 won in the last 10 years?Just because you've never won there doesn't mean it sucks.BUT ZOMG THE ROSE BOWL IS THE MOAST BEST BOWL![]()
http://www.collegefo...story_rose.html
Well, we have attended the same number of times as 3 B1G teams and did beat out one other team. Not bad for being in the the league only 2 years.Just because you've never won there doesn't mean it sucks.BUT ZOMG THE ROSE BOWL IS THE MOAST BEST BOWL![]()
The ACC took Louisville, otherwise I'm sure the Big 12 would have loved to get them.I do not miss it at all. The feel of the conference had a divided feel to it. The South teams did not embrace the games that were going on outside of Texas. Plus I was no longer excited to see the 6 North teams always on the schedule, with just 2 teams from the South. I wished it was more mixed up.
The only thing I care about it now is that TCU joined and that they keep hammering Texas each year. So glad the Frogs took down UT in Austin last year. Also, you would think the Big 12 has to wonder why they chose WV over Louisville for their 12th team. Or maybe they did know Louisville was better than WV in football, hoops (men and women) and baseball.
And just look at the scheduling. To welcome TCU to the conference, they sure made their point to give the Horned Frogs in consecutive weeks: @Okie State, @West Virginia, Kansas State, @Texas, Oklahoma. That kind of crap is why I am glad NU is no longer there.
This year look at a four week stretch scheduled between Texas and TCU:
Texas: OU, bye week, @TCU, Kansas
TCU: Kansas, @Oklahoma State, Texas, West Virginia
UT's schedule is more favorable. By accident? My thoughts are that the head office does not want TCU and WV to come into the conference without knowing who the big boys are (UT/OU). They will do their best to take away any hope, by making things difficult their first several years in the conference by getting beat down. That way they can take their place as the 2nd tier group.
I have lived here in Texas most of my life, so you would think someone like me would miss it. But if you put on the local news, the teams from the North were hardly mentioned. Even the scores came across as more of a footnote.
That's how it should be. The Big Ten didn't have to take us in. They could've left us in the Big 12. Same with Rutgers and Maryland. So the new schools should have a brutal schedule to welcome us and them to the conference.The ACC took Louisville, otherwise I'm sure the Big 12 would have loved to get them.I do not miss it at all. The feel of the conference had a divided feel to it. The South teams did not embrace the games that were going on outside of Texas. Plus I was no longer excited to see the 6 North teams always on the schedule, with just 2 teams from the South. I wished it was more mixed up.
The only thing I care about it now is that TCU joined and that they keep hammering Texas each year. So glad the Frogs took down UT in Austin last year. Also, you would think the Big 12 has to wonder why they chose WV over Louisville for their 12th team. Or maybe they did know Louisville was better than WV in football, hoops (men and women) and baseball.
And just look at the scheduling. To welcome TCU to the conference, they sure made their point to give the Horned Frogs in consecutive weeks: @Okie State, @West Virginia, Kansas State, @Texas, Oklahoma. That kind of crap is why I am glad NU is no longer there.
This year look at a four week stretch scheduled between Texas and TCU:
Texas: OU, bye week, @TCU, Kansas
TCU: Kansas, @Oklahoma State, Texas, West Virginia
UT's schedule is more favorable. By accident? My thoughts are that the head office does not want TCU and WV to come into the conference without knowing who the big boys are (UT/OU). They will do their best to take away any hope, by making things difficult their first several years in the conference by getting beat down. That way they can take their place as the 2nd tier group.
I have lived here in Texas most of my life, so you would think someone like me would miss it. But if you put on the local news, the teams from the North were hardly mentioned. Even the scores came across as more of a footnote.
Also, how can you say that TCU got an unfair schedule when it's round robin style play? Everyone plays everyone. The teams who are getting the unfair treatment are the ones who join the Big Ten. All 3 additions had/will have the conference's murderers row for the first two seasons.
Oh relax, don't get butt-hurt.... We're not leaving...Just because you've never won there doesn't mean it sucks.BUT ZOMG THE ROSE BOWL IS THE MOAST BEST BOWL![]()
The politics aside, I miss the easy road trips. I miss the gameday atmospheres at K-State and at Mizzou. I miss the Thursday night games. I miss NIGHT games period. I miss our rivalries. I'm not liking the "country club" feel of the B1G.
I am not cherry picking a random 4 game stretch. The difference in scheduling speaks for itself. Texas is always competing with TCU for the best recruits in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.Why are you cherry picking a random 4-game stretch to try to prove favoritism?
Also, the B1G did the exact same thing with Nebraska in our first two years, making us play OSU, UM, PSU, MSU, and Wisconsin.
And also, Texas and Oklahoma will always have an easier schedule than everyone else because they don't have to play themselves. Other teams may have to play both Texas AND OU. Texas only has to play OU obviously. (Insert some joke about how Texas and Oklahoma *suck* now if you want)
Ok cool, thanks for the clarification on Louisville. For some reason I thought both schools (Loui/WV) were still tied to Big East when the Big 12 were scrambling for teams.The ACC took Louisville, otherwise I'm sure the Big 12 would have loved to get them.I do not miss it at all. The feel of the conference had a divided feel to it. The South teams did not embrace the games that were going on outside of Texas. Plus I was no longer excited to see the 6 North teams always on the schedule, with just 2 teams from the South. I wished it was more mixed up.
The only thing I care about it now is that TCU joined and that they keep hammering Texas each year. So glad the Frogs took down UT in Austin last year. Also, you would think the Big 12 has to wonder why they chose WV over Louisville for their 12th team. Or maybe they did know Louisville was better than WV in football, hoops (men and women) and baseball.
And just look at the scheduling. To welcome TCU to the conference, they sure made their point to give the Horned Frogs in consecutive weeks: @Okie State, @West Virginia, Kansas State, @Texas, Oklahoma. That kind of crap is why I am glad NU is no longer there.
This year look at a four week stretch scheduled between Texas and TCU:
Texas: OU, bye week, @TCU, Kansas
TCU: Kansas, @Oklahoma State, Texas, West Virginia
UT's schedule is more favorable. By accident? My thoughts are that the head office does not want TCU and WV to come into the conference without knowing who the big boys are (UT/OU). They will do their best to take away any hope, by making things difficult their first several years in the conference by getting beat down. That way they can take their place as the 2nd tier group.
I have lived here in Texas most of my life, so you would think someone like me would miss it. But if you put on the local news, the teams from the North were hardly mentioned. Even the scores came across as more of a footnote.
Also, how can you say that TCU got an unfair schedule when it's round robin style play? Everyone plays everyone. The teams who are getting the unfair treatment are the ones who join the Big Ten. All 3 additions had/will have the conference's murderers row for the first two seasons.
Any 4-game stretch you pick will be cherry-picking. Look at the schedule as a whole or don't bother looking at all.I am not cherry picking a random 4 game stretch.
You are right. Mrandyk too. And I'm just glad we are in the Big Ten.That's how it should be. The Big Ten didn't have to take us in. They could've left us in the Big 12. Same with Rutgers and Maryland. So the new schools should have a brutal schedule to welcome us and them to the conference.The ACC took Louisville, otherwise I'm sure the Big 12 would have loved to get them.I do not miss it at all. The feel of the conference had a divided feel to it. The South teams did not embrace the games that were going on outside of Texas. Plus I was no longer excited to see the 6 North teams always on the schedule, with just 2 teams from the South. I wished it was more mixed up.
The only thing I care about it now is that TCU joined and that they keep hammering Texas each year. So glad the Frogs took down UT in Austin last year. Also, you would think the Big 12 has to wonder why they chose WV over Louisville for their 12th team. Or maybe they did know Louisville was better than WV in football, hoops (men and women) and baseball.
And just look at the scheduling. To welcome TCU to the conference, they sure made their point to give the Horned Frogs in consecutive weeks: @Okie State, @West Virginia, Kansas State, @Texas, Oklahoma. That kind of crap is why I am glad NU is no longer there.
This year look at a four week stretch scheduled between Texas and TCU:
Texas: OU, bye week, @TCU, Kansas
TCU: Kansas, @Oklahoma State, Texas, West Virginia
UT's schedule is more favorable. By accident? My thoughts are that the head office does not want TCU and WV to come into the conference without knowing who the big boys are (UT/OU). They will do their best to take away any hope, by making things difficult their first several years in the conference by getting beat down. That way they can take their place as the 2nd tier group.
I have lived here in Texas most of my life, so you would think someone like me would miss it. But if you put on the local news, the teams from the North were hardly mentioned. Even the scores came across as more of a footnote.
Also, how can you say that TCU got an unfair schedule when it's round robin style play? Everyone plays everyone. The teams who are getting the unfair treatment are the ones who join the Big Ten. All 3 additions had/will have the conference's murderers row for the first two seasons.