Blackshirts007
New member
GSG5545 said:
NCAA 14 Wishlist
- Thread starter Husker NoNo
- Start date
Decked
Active member
Ranking for teams http://kegsneggsblog...ed-for-ncaa-14/ Nebraska is at 88 overall with a 91 offense and an 85 defense. While Michigan State has a 92 ranked offense lol. And North Carolina is a 91 overall.
Last edited by a moderator:
Saunders
Administrator
Here’s how the Big Ten teams stack up:
1. Ohio State 95 (97 offense, 92 defense)
T-2. Michigan 91 (91, 92)
T-2. Michigan State 91 (90, 93)
T-4. Iowa 88 (88, 90)
T-4. Nebraska 88 (91, 85)
T-4. Wisconsin 88 (88, 88)
7. Northwestern 86 (86, 87)
T-8. Penn State 84 (86, 85)
T-8. Purdue 84 (84, 85)
10. Illinois 83 (86, 80)
11. Indiana 81 (83, 82)
12. Minnesota 79 (79, 80)
http://btn.com/2013/06/11/ncaa-14-team-ratings-raise-some-eyebrows/
dafuq??????
1. Ohio State 95 (97 offense, 92 defense)
T-2. Michigan 91 (91, 92)
T-2. Michigan State 91 (90, 93)
T-4. Iowa 88 (88, 90)
T-4. Nebraska 88 (91, 85)
T-4. Wisconsin 88 (88, 88)
7. Northwestern 86 (86, 87)
T-8. Penn State 84 (86, 85)
T-8. Purdue 84 (84, 85)
10. Illinois 83 (86, 80)
11. Indiana 81 (83, 82)
12. Minnesota 79 (79, 80)
http://btn.com/2013/06/11/ncaa-14-team-ratings-raise-some-eyebrows/
dafuq??????
The Maudfather
New member
Our offense is only 91? WTF?
EA being EA.I'll bet Taylor's speed is probably sh**ty again too.
EA being EA.I'll bet Taylor's speed is probably sh**ty again too.
It'sNotAFakeID
New member
Doesn't matter too much once the actual named roster files are out
iowahuskers
New member
Taylor is one of the fastest players in CFB but he is always slow in the game.
I just don't understand these ratings.... how can Iowa be the same as us? and Our offense is only a 91.
iowahuskers
New member
Just saw the top ten players for our team. 4 of them are linemen. TMagic is a 91.
Here is a link to the video. were at 2:22. http://www.cougcenter.com/2013/6/13/4427634/ncaa-football-14-player-ratings
Here is a link to the video. were at 2:22. http://www.cougcenter.com/2013/6/13/4427634/ncaa-football-14-player-ratings
Last edited by a moderator:
B.B. Hemingway
Donor
That'll be pretty cool.... I didn't buy last years game (I think its the first year I've never purchased), so how does the zone read work? The year before last it sucked video game a$$....
It'sNotAFakeID
New member
A notable improvement in the E3 videos I've seen is that the CPU teams run the option much better and make more logical decisions on when to keep or when to pitch. I'm guessing Heisman difficulty this year is going to be significantly harder than in any edition before.
Looks like the zone read is improved as well.
Last edited by a moderator:
ZRod
Well-known member
If Ohio State's offense is a 97 then ours is at least a 95. I didn't purchase last years edition but in previous years our ratings turned out to be more accurate than not. Taylor has always been way too slow though, and has never had the acceleration he actually has in the real world. Ameer better be something like Dempsey was at Florida or that guy at Colorado. Small quick and shifty, I always had trouble with those guys breaking off big runs.
Last edited by a moderator:
iowahuskers
New member
For some reason last year last year I remember JT and KBell not being very fast or quick in the game so I hope they change that. I also noticed that AA ins't even in our top ten which means he can only be an 85/84 overall. I just don't understand how we can be the same as Iowa overall. Our offense should be mid 90s too.
Chaddyboxer
Banned
Who the hell do they hire to formulate the teams and score them!? It's a bunch of crap that Iowa is matched up with the Huskers. Taylor better have increased acceleration this year...b/c the game actually may be worth the buy....MAYBE.