Zaire Anderson updates?

Good question.

if he was healthy, why keep a guy whose played 3 yrs of college ball on the sideline?

he can't be worse or slower or more unknowledgeable than the Frosh we played?

he must have been hurt.

 
Warrior10 said:
We played Dime. In dime his position isn't on the field.
Click to expand...
Ditto, he was not playing because he's not the dime linebacker. Saw him a couple of times running down on kickoff coverage. No problems, just not in position to play on D because we were in dime the entire game.

 
Disagree with decision to stay in dime. We need more run help and I get tired of seeing our one LB get run-off with motion. Zaire needs to be in there.

 
Danimal said:
Disagree with decision to stay in dime. We need more run help and I get tired of seeing our one LB get run-off with motion. Zaire needs to be in there.
Click to expand...
Do you line up LBs on WRs then when they go five wide????

 
EZ-E said:
Danimal said:
Disagree with decision to stay in dime. We need more run help and I get tired of seeing our one LB get run-off with motion. Zaire needs to be in there.
Click to expand...
Do you line up LBs on WRs then when they go five wide????
Click to expand...
No. You can play nickel and use man-man coverage though. Then you have 2 LB's on the field. Surprised we didn't see that type of formation.

 
MLB 51 said:
EZ-E said:
Danimal said:
Disagree with decision to stay in dime. We need more run help and I get tired of seeing our one LB get run-off with motion. Zaire needs to be in there.
Click to expand...
Do you line up LBs on WRs then when they go five wide????
Click to expand...
No. You can play nickel and use man-man coverage though. Then you have 2 LB's on the field. Surprised we didn't see that type of formation.
Click to expand...
You'll never see Bo play without at least one high safety.

 
EZ-E said:
MLB 51 said:
EZ-E said:
Danimal said:
Disagree with decision to stay in dime. We need more run help and I get tired of seeing our one LB get run-off with motion. Zaire needs to be in there.
Click to expand...
Do you line up LBs on WRs then when they go five wide????
Click to expand...
No. You can play nickel and use man-man coverage though. Then you have 2 LB's on the field. Surprised we didn't see that type of formation.
Click to expand...
You'll never see Bo play without at least one high safety.
Click to expand...
Then in that case go with that nickel with Gerry as a hybrid S/LB and let him disguise himself as an lb before dropping into deep coverage using a press man to give him time to get there.

 
I didn't watch the game but the radio broadcast made it seem like they were running 4WR sets quite frequently. Wouldn't the dime be the appropriate counter to that?

 
zoogies said:
I didn't watch the game but the radio broadcast made it seem like they were running 4WR sets quite frequently. Wouldn't the dime be the appropriate counter to that?
Click to expand...
Appropriate, yes, but not a necessity. As Army_Allen stated, you could use Gerry as hybrid and disguise him as LB.

 
We probably stayed in dime due to Wyo's hurry up offense. Not a lot of personnel changes during that game.

 
EZ-E said:
MLB 51 said:
EZ-E said:
Danimal said:
Disagree with decision to stay in dime. We need more run help and I get tired of seeing our one LB get run-off with motion. Zaire needs to be in there.
Click to expand...
Do you line up LBs on WRs then when they go five wide????
Click to expand...
No. You can play nickel and use man-man coverage though. Then you have 2 LB's on the field. Surprised we didn't see that type of formation.
Click to expand...
You'll never see Bo play without at least one high safety.
Click to expand...
That is what he announcers said Wyoming was keying in on. Depending on 1 or 2 safeties deep, they knew which plays to run. Seems if Bo is committed to this, can't he disguise our coverages better?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top