Does anyone think that this defense is showing signs of being a conference-champion caliber defense? Because I'm liking what I'm seeing out of these young guys more and more every week.
Yes, but I wonder how exciting that really is.
We were talking about this at the tailgate today - the problems with this team/program aren't black&white. I think that's easy to see because they keep being fixed, one by one, but without improvement as a whole.
First it was an anemic offense - fixed that pretty well.
Then it was a poor offensive line that would spend 3 days giving up a sack, a false start and a holding call. Our line is pretty good now, and those penalties have been cut
way down.
Then it was lousy recruiting - we've been getting good talent the last few seasons.
Then it was (not really going in order) switching to a new conference - well, we're in season three. That excuse has run out.
Then it was scheme our players were too crappy to execute - we have better players and have shown progress but still have the Minnesota and UCLA games as proof that there's some ugly in there.
Basically, the above might not be entirely accurate, but the question needs to be asked - as each of these individual things improve, why are the big picture end results not also improving? Because there's still something at the core that is very wrong with the way our program approaches football games, and more experienced players, more capable defense, a favorable schedule or whatever other element you want to focus on isn't going to fix whatever is wrong. It transcends and handcuffs all of that.
I just wish we knew what it was.