Game of the Century talk. No. 1 Ohio State and No. 2

Eric the Red

Team HuskerBoard
If your interested in pregame chatter, here's a site that was refered to us last year. The opertao visited us quite a bit last year pregame Alamo bowl.

http://michiganproject.com/

No. 1 Ohio State 54 (11-0) , Northwestern 10 (3-8)

No. 2 Michigan 34 (11-0) , Indiana 3 (5-6)

Nothing stands between Ohio State and Michigan

By David Albright

ESPN.com

EVANSTON, Ill. -- The Bucknuts got their money's worth.

More than 20,000 scarlet-clad Ohio State fans invaded Chicago's north shore in part because it's infinitely easier to find a ticket at Ryan Field (capacity: 47,130) than it is to find one at Ohio Stadium (102,329).

The other reason: a chance to see the No. 1 ranked Buckeyes in their final tuneup before next Saturday's regular-season finale against No. 2 Michigan (ABC, 3:30 p.m. ET).

And thanks to three first-quarter Wildcats turnovers that were quickly converted to three touchdowns, Ohio State rolled to a 54-10 win over Northwestern.

In addition to a complete recovery from the hangover that followed a 17-10 win at Illinois on Nov. 4, Ohio State can now completely turn its attention to Michigan -- who won 34-3 at Indiana.

Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images

Troy Smith had no problems Saturday with a thumb injury.

The 103rd meeting -- and most important in decades -- between the 11-0 Buckeyes and the 11-0 Wolverines is now fair game to discuss because it's finally the next one of the schedule.

Let the countdown to Columbus -- and the accompanying cacophony of hype -- begin.

"The Ohio State-Michigan game is always the biggest game," Ohio State coach Jim Tressel said. "It doesn't matter what the records are or what's on the table for the outcome. The fact that it's 1 vs. 2, we think that's the way it should be.

"This is the Ohio State-Michigan game. It really isn't about the BCS or anything else. It's about the Big Ten conference and playing against your rival."

The good news for the Buckeyes is that they will enter The Game with a lot of momentum.

Heisman frontrunner Troy Smith, who earlier in the week admitted to playing with an injured thumb on his throwing hand, showed no ill effects and tied a career high by throwing four touchdowns (to three different receivers) on 12-of-19 passing for 185 yards.

"This is the Ohio State-Michigan game. It really isn't about the BCS or anything else. It's about the Big Ten conference and playing against your rival."

-- Ohio State coach Jim Tressel

In addition to reliable outlets Ted Ginn, Jr. (2-40, 1 TD) and Anthony Gonzalez (2-34, 1 TD), Smith (24-2 as a starter) also found freshman Brian Hartline (3-47) for the first two TDs of his career.

Ohio State also put up 231 rushing yards, led by Chris Wells (99 yards, 1 TD) and Antonio Pittman (80 yards, 1 TD), who went over the 1,000-yard mark for the second straight season -- the first Buckeye to do that since Eddie George in 1994-95.

"It just shows you how many weapons we have on this offense," Pittman said. "There's so many guys who deserve the ball but there's only one football and you have to wait your turn."

The better news for Tressel and his staff is that there is still plenty to work on this week so that should help to keep the players' attention.

Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images

Antonio Pittman went over the 1,000-yard mark for the second straight season Saturday.

"Obviously we turned it over a couple of times which we've got to straighten out," Tressel said. "That can't happen next week."

And the Buckeyes' defense, which came in giving up just 258 yards a game, surrendered 235 to Northwestern in the first half.

But it's hard to complain too much about a defense that came up with five turnovers.

"It was real hard for us to not look forward," said strong safety Brandon Mitchell, who picked off a C.J. Bacher pass in the first quarter and returned it 46 yards for a TD to give the Buckeyes that 21-0 lead. "We all know the importance of this game and we know it's the biggest game that probably anyone on the team will ever play in -- at least we're going to approach it that way."

"It's called 'The Game' for a reason," center Doug Datish said. "It's a privilege and an honor to be able to play in that game. It's going to be everything that it's made up to be and everything that's going to be talked about."

Game on.

David Albright is the senior coordinator for college sports at ESPN.com. He can be reached at david.albright@espn3.com.

 
I'm taking Ohio State 38-24 . . . I don't think the Wolverines stand a chance.

*gets out fork and knife for when I have to eat my words later*

 
As much as the media has been bragging up this game for the whole season. It better be a damn good game. I don't care who wins just as along as there is not a rematch in the Championship game.

 
:yeah That would probably piss me off and show a lot of bias in the BCS system if Michigan and Ohio State would get a chance to play in the National Championship............especially if there are any undefeated teams behind them......
 
I agree. If it's a close game, the loser has as good a chance as anyone to get to the Championship.

BTW, does anyone else find it utterly ridiculous that the Championship game is Jan. 8???

Jan. 8?? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

 
I agree. If it's a close game, the loser has as good a chance as anyone to get to the Championship.

BTW, does anyone else find it utterly ridiculous that the Championship game is Jan. 8???

Jan. 8?? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
I totally agree, alot of the critics of a playoff system say it would take too long. However, the bowl season is about a month long the way it is. I loved the old days where there were about 15 games on New Years Day. Everyone of the big matchups were on four different channels. Now their is like five games on with three of them on ABC while they have, I think four games after New Years Day.

 
Yes, the championship game drags out an extra day each year, so it seems. I dont agree that OSU will play Meechigan again for the National Championship, even if it is close. Nope. Not gonna happen. If USC wins the rest of the year, they'll play the winner. If Notre Dame wins out, it's them. Could even be one of those ugly, over-hyped, over-rated SEC teams too. But you dont finish the season with a loss and then play for the Championship. I think the Huskers ended up doing that by default, when they played Miami. We'll see how it plays out though.

If OSU and Meechigan play 10 times this year, they split 5-5. That doesnt determine a champion.

 
This game does not warrant "Game of the Century" status. I'll go so far as to say I think whoever winds up winning the National Championship game will be one of the weakest champions of the past several years.

 
I agree. If it's a close game, the loser has as good a chance as anyone to get to the Championship.

BTW, does anyone else find it utterly ridiculous that the Championship game is Jan. 8???

Jan. 8?? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
I totally agree, alot of the critics of a playoff system say it would take too long. However, the bowl season is about a month long the way it is. I loved the old days where there were about 15 games on New Years Day. Everyone of the big matchups were on four different channels. Now their is like five games on with three of them on ABC while they have, I think four games after New Years Day.
:yeah I wish there were a lot more games on. I would set up multiple tv's and just sit there eating.

 
Why can't we wait till after the game to deem it a game of the century? Gotta love the media. I don't think Michigan can pull it off and will get outclassed by the Buckeyes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe with the recent passing of Bo that Michigan will have a little extra spark. I still like Ohio State in this game but I think it could be very close.

 
Back
Top