Personally I'm not mad about anything.
I have no problem with Bo being hired without head coach experience. Head coaching experience isn't and has never been an indicator of future success. Coaching hires are always a risk.
The trick is minimizing risk while maximizing potential positive gain but all while not letting the idea of being conservative keep you from going after someone that all signs point to eventually being great.
There's no reason not to hire Scott Frost if we need a new coach (just as one example, not the only one). He might not be any better than Bo, but the chances that he could be are really good, and he IS going to be a power 5 head coach soon. We don't want to be the school that missed out on him because we were scared of the gamble.
Frost is definitely not my first choice when it comes to a replacement for our current coach, but I would be ok with it.
I just find it incredibly funny that there are a lot of people out there with some pretty good ties to North Stadium that would not treat it as the prodigal son returning home as many in the media would.
That's neither here nor there, by the way, and it doesn't mean he would be a bad hire. It's just one of the things that would be present. And if those people had an agenda to sabotage and make it hard formFrost to succeed,well then we aren't getting away from a pretty big internal problem that plagued our last three coaches.