At least we got points. Unlike MSU.........I suppose I could pile on by pointing out that our first 3 drives really weren't anything special as they were built on turnovers and we settled for a field goal on the first...
At least we got points. Unlike MSU.........I suppose I could pile on by pointing out that our first 3 drives really weren't anything special as they were built on turnovers and we settled for a field goal on the first...
defense was very solid in 2010 as well. Bos philosophy works against pass happy offenses. It still does. Look at tge numbers put by opposing teams even to this day. The problem is its so damn susceptible to teams with any sort of balance and/or qb run threat. Or in the case of wisconsin, well executed straight up power teams. And coincidentally the downward trend of the defense really took hold in 2011. Lot of us thought it was just overall lack of talent and personnel but its pretty clear now that aint the case.Funny how we have had this conversation about our defense ever since Suh left. If I were to look at things in a big picture manner it would seem like Suh was the only reason the defensive scheme worked against good teams. The Huskers out talent lesser teams now, but refuse to see its the scheme holding them back from being competitive against better teams without him. And it seems like we have plenty of talent to field a good offense and even returned many key areas with experience but they act like they are learning everything new again every year. It all just baffles me these past few seasons.Funny Wisconsin replaced 9 guys on D from a year ago and they have the right guys for the system, make tackles, are in the right spots with a rookie DC. If Tim had a clue we would have put up 40 on those guys. What's more worrisome is what the hell is our D doing that we can't play D like they do? You can't tell me wisconsin has more talent on D.
What kills me, is look at his time at LSU. 3 seasons with a top 3 defense. Even NU in 2009 (SUH), but what the hell happened to that Bo?defense was very solid in 2010 as well. Bos philosophy works against pass happy offenses. It still does. Look at tge numbers put by opposing teams even to this day. The problem is its so damn susceptible to teams with any sort of balance and/or qb run threat. Or in the case of wisconsin, well executed straight up power teams. And coincidentally the downward trend of the defense really took hold in 2011. Lot of us thought it was just overall lack of talent and personnel but its pretty clear now that aint the case.Funny how we have had this conversation about our defense ever since Suh left. If I were to look at things in a big picture manner it would seem like Suh was the only reason the defensive scheme worked against good teams. The Huskers out talent lesser teams now, but refuse to see its the scheme holding them back from being competitive against better teams without him. And it seems like we have plenty of talent to field a good offense and even returned many key areas with experience but they act like they are learning everything new again every year. It all just baffles me these past few seasons.Funny Wisconsin replaced 9 guys on D from a year ago and they have the right guys for the system, make tackles, are in the right spots with a rookie DC. If Tim had a clue we would have put up 40 on those guys. What's more worrisome is what the hell is our D doing that we can't play D like they do? You can't tell me wisconsin has more talent on D.
yet Beck could be a good gead coach. That we dont know yet. This is the interesting dynamic that is such a big part of college football anymore.What kills me, is look at his time at LSU. 3 seasons with a top 3 defense. Even NU in 2009 (SUH), but what the hell happened to that Bo?defense was very solid in 2010 as well. Bos philosophy works against pass happy offenses. It still does. Look at tge numbers put by opposing teams even to this day. The problem is its so damn susceptible to teams with any sort of balance and/or qb run threat. Or in the case of wisconsin, well executed straight up power teams. And coincidentally the downward trend of the defense really took hold in 2011. Lot of us thought it was just overall lack of talent and personnel but its pretty clear now that aint the case.Funny how we have had this conversation about our defense ever since Suh left. If I were to look at things in a big picture manner it would seem like Suh was the only reason the defensive scheme worked against good teams. The Huskers out talent lesser teams now, but refuse to see its the scheme holding them back from being competitive against better teams without him. And it seems like we have plenty of talent to field a good offense and even returned many key areas with experience but they act like they are learning everything new again every year. It all just baffles me these past few seasons.Funny Wisconsin replaced 9 guys on D from a year ago and they have the right guys for the system, make tackles, are in the right spots with a rookie DC. If Tim had a clue we would have put up 40 on those guys. What's more worrisome is what the hell is our D doing that we can't play D like they do? You can't tell me wisconsin has more talent on D.
I mentioned Craig Bohl in another thread. Horrible DC (Frank) IMO, but has done a great job at NDSU. Anxious to see Wyoming. Bo, historically great DC, but HC lacking. Some guys are great with a single scope mission and not the "big picture" as mentioned by Bo in the presser. I really think Bo would excel as a DC, but he misses how all the parts come together. This is evidence to a degree in how NU has gone under Bo. No complete games, only flashes in quarters, TO's increase and penalties decrease, O sucks and D is good, ST sucks and O plays well etc.....Pieces and parts, but never the whole team for 4 quarters..........
Back on topic, Beck is not a good OC......
I thought the same when I read that article. A "proven" system? Where has it been proven? When? Cobbling together a bunch of other coaches' random plays and then arbitrarily throwing them randomly at opponents does not constitute a "proven" system. The only thing our offense has "proven" is that it can't win any sort of championship or big gameTim Beck saying his offense is proven over a long period of time (assuming he's including his time as Nebraska's offensive coordinator in his assessment) is probably the funniest thing I've heard all week.
I didn't think it was possible for Wisconsin to BLAST us AGAIN the same way they did in that 2012 CCG, because I thought for sure Pelini would have spent many sleepless nights figuring out exactly what went wrong and how to stop it. But I was wrong. I guess Pelini doesn't have as much competitive self-respect as a football coach as I thought.A bad play, a bad game, or a bad season are all learning opportunities. The staff should be dissecting every play to determine why and improve. This staff prefers to ignore the results and then sees the exact same results. Wisky has killed us 3 times. This is ridiculous.
That Bo was a DC; this Bo is the head coach. I'm all for moving him back to DC and hiring a real head coach. I bet our defense would even improve.What kills me, is look at his time at LSU. 3 seasons with a top 3 defense. Even NU in 2009 (SUH), but what the hell happened to that Bo?defense was very solid in 2010 as well. Bos philosophy works against pass happy offenses. It still does. Look at tge numbers put by opposing teams even to this day. The problem is its so damn susceptible to teams with any sort of balance and/or qb run threat. Or in the case of wisconsin, well executed straight up power teams. And coincidentally the downward trend of the defense really took hold in 2011. Lot of us thought it was just overall lack of talent and personnel but its pretty clear now that aint the case.
I mentioned Craig Bohl in another thread. Horrible DC (Frank) IMO, but has done a great job at NDSU. Anxious to see Wyoming. Bo, historically great DC, but HC lacking. Some guys are great with a single scope mission and not the "big picture" as mentioned by Bo in the presser. I really think Bo would excel as a DC, but he misses how all the parts come together. This is evidence to a degree in how NU has gone under Bo. No complete games, only flashes in quarters, TO's increase and penalties decrease, O sucks and D is good, ST sucks and O plays well etc.....Pieces and parts, but never the whole team for 4 quarters..........
Back on topic, Beck is not a good OC......
Not to mention the juxtaposition between the hype and the results. In 2013, it was supposed to be the "Scoring Explosion" or whatever. This year it was supposed to be "Red Storm." Someone needs to teach these kids to talk with their play, not their mouths.I thought the same when I read that article. A "proven" system? Where has it been proven? When? Cobbling together a bunch of other coaches' random plays and then arbitrarily throwing them randomly at opponents does not constitute a "proven" system. The only thing our offense has "proven" is that it can't win any sort of championship or big gameTim Beck saying his offense is proven over a long period of time (assuming he's including his time as Nebraska's offensive coordinator in his assessment) is probably the funniest thing I've heard all week.
Hell in a Helmet!!!Not to mention the juxtaposition between the hype and the results. In 2013, it was supposed to be the "Scoring Explosion" or whatever. This year it was supposed to be "Red Storm." Someone needs to teach these kids to talk with their play, not their mouths.I thought the same when I read that article. A "proven" system? Where has it been proven? When? Cobbling together a bunch of other coaches' random plays and then arbitrarily throwing them randomly at opponents does not constitute a "proven" system. The only thing our offense has "proven" is that it can't win any sort of championship or big gameTim Beck saying his offense is proven over a long period of time (assuming he's including his time as Nebraska's offensive coordinator in his assessment) is probably the funniest thing I've heard all week.
IMO that was a prime era for Tampa 2, and people have moved on, sh#t moves fast these daysWhat kills me, is look at his time at LSU. 3 seasons with a top 3 defense. Even NU in 2009 (SUH), but what the hell happened to that Bo?defense was very solid in 2010 as well. Bos philosophy works against pass happy offenses. It still does. Look at tge numbers put by opposing teams even to this day. The problem is its so damn susceptible to teams with any sort of balance and/or qb run threat. Or in the case of wisconsin, well executed straight up power teams. And coincidentally the downward trend of the defense really took hold in 2011. Lot of us thought it was just overall lack of talent and personnel but its pretty clear now that aint the case.Funny how we have had this conversation about our defense ever since Suh left. If I were to look at things in a big picture manner it would seem like Suh was the only reason the defensive scheme worked against good teams. The Huskers out talent lesser teams now, but refuse to see its the scheme holding them back from being competitive against better teams without him. And it seems like we have plenty of talent to field a good offense and even returned many key areas with experience but they act like they are learning everything new again every year. It all just baffles me these past few seasons.Funny Wisconsin replaced 9 guys on D from a year ago and they have the right guys for the system, make tackles, are in the right spots with a rookie DC. If Tim had a clue we would have put up 40 on those guys. What's more worrisome is what the hell is our D doing that we can't play D like they do? You can't tell me wisconsin has more talent on D.
I mentioned Craig Bohl in another thread. Horrible DC (Frank) IMO, but has done a great job at NDSU. Anxious to see Wyoming. Bo, historically great DC, but HC lacking. Some guys are great with a single scope mission and not the "big picture" as mentioned by Bo in the presser. I really think Bo would excel as a DC, but he misses how all the parts come together. This is evidence to a degree in how NU has gone under Bo. No complete games, only flashes in quarters, TO's increase and penalties decrease, O sucks and D is good, ST sucks and O plays well etc.....Pieces and parts, but never the whole team for 4 quarters..........
Back on topic, Beck is not a good OC......
The two current successful defensive trends in both pro and college ball are the "quarters" variant of cover 4 (most of them played out of a 4-3 or sometimes a 4-2-5/nickel formation) and an aggressive zone blitzing 3-4. I have been playing around with a scheme that combines the two, but I don't know enough about the linebackers responsibilities in the 3-4 system yet. I've been doing some research, but I'm pretty sure I'd have to talk to a coach who run a 3-4 system...IMO that was a prime era for Tampa 2, and people have moved on, sh#t moves fast these daysWhat kills me, is look at his time at LSU. 3 seasons with a top 3 defense. Even NU in 2009 (SUH), but what the hell happened to that Bo?defense was very solid in 2010 as well. Bos philosophy works against pass happy offenses. It still does. Look at tge numbers put by opposing teams even to this day. The problem is its so damn susceptible to teams with any sort of balance and/or qb run threat. Or in the case of wisconsin, well executed straight up power teams. And coincidentally the downward trend of the defense really took hold in 2011. Lot of us thought it was just overall lack of talent and personnel but its pretty clear now that aint the case.Funny how we have had this conversation about our defense ever since Suh left. If I were to look at things in a big picture manner it would seem like Suh was the only reason the defensive scheme worked against good teams. The Huskers out talent lesser teams now, but refuse to see its the scheme holding them back from being competitive against better teams without him. And it seems like we have plenty of talent to field a good offense and even returned many key areas with experience but they act like they are learning everything new again every year. It all just baffles me these past few seasons.Funny Wisconsin replaced 9 guys on D from a year ago and they have the right guys for the system, make tackles, are in the right spots with a rookie DC. If Tim had a clue we would have put up 40 on those guys. What's more worrisome is what the hell is our D doing that we can't play D like they do? You can't tell me wisconsin has more talent on D.
I mentioned Craig Bohl in another thread. Horrible DC (Frank) IMO, but has done a great job at NDSU. Anxious to see Wyoming. Bo, historically great DC, but HC lacking. Some guys are great with a single scope mission and not the "big picture" as mentioned by Bo in the presser. I really think Bo would excel as a DC, but he misses how all the parts come together. This is evidence to a degree in how NU has gone under Bo. No complete games, only flashes in quarters, TO's increase and penalties decrease, O sucks and D is good, ST sucks and O plays well etc.....Pieces and parts, but never the whole team for 4 quarters..........
Back on topic, Beck is not a good OC......
This is the proverbial nail in the coffin. All stats, performances, etc aside. Bo just doesn't have the abilities to get all phases of the game in sync or make adjustments in the game. Have one series set to flow into the next.........I get a kick out of everyone saying Bo isn't a big picture guy....I mean isn't that the entire point of a HC? Hell he said himself he doesn't look at the big picture stuff...why are we paying this guy 3+ mil again?
I laughed out loud. At least it would show honesty and humility."I'm a dumbass" is the only thing I want to hear out of Beck right now.