***2015 Recruiting***

MattyIce said:
I don't like him because I've seen him play...
Click to expand...
That's strange. The few times he's been on the field he's been reasonably productive considering the circumstances. Unless you've seen him play in situations other than what we've all seen, I'm curious to how you've come to this conclusion?

 
Three spots left but spread among five positions. Curious to see what happens. We are almost assuredly taking a LB and will take a LS if Ober says yes. Not sure who the staff would take after that.

LB - One more. Not sure if we prefer Hall or Garbutt (both visiting this weekend) but Talan seems to be behind them.
DE - Taking one. No idea what our order is. Davis visiting this weekend.
WR - Alston (visiting) if he wants N
OL - Paulo (visiting) if he wants N
LS - Ober (visiting) or we'll have to scramble pretty fast.

------------------------------------

QB - 0
RB - 1 - Ozigbo
WR - 2 - Morgan (Alston)
TE - 1 - Snyder
OT - 1-2 - Gaylord (Paulo)
OG/C - 2 - Decker, Barnett

DT - 2 - C. Davis, K. Davis
DE - 2 - Neal, (Bailey, Roberts, Davis)
LB - 4 - Young, Ferguson, Barry (Talan, Hall, Garbutt)
CB - 2 - Lee, Anderson
S - 2 - Williams, Sykes

LS - 1 - (Ober)

 
what happens if all 8 end up committing mavric? are we in trouble or what do they end up doing? I realize all 8 actually commiting is slim to none but lets just play hypothetical for one minute

 
That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that.

The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible.

 
Mavric said:
That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that.

The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible.
Click to expand...
Early enrollees go towards last years number don't They?

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
Mavric said:
That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that.

The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible.
Click to expand...
Early enrollees go towards last years number don't They?
Click to expand...
They can but it doesn't matter at this point. The only number is 85 - or 88 with the three over-signings.

 
Mavric said:
Hedley Lamarr said:
Mavric said:
That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that.

The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible.
Click to expand...
Early enrollees go towards last years number don't They?
Click to expand...
They can but it doesn't matter at this point. The only number is 85 - or 88 with the three over-signings.
Click to expand...
Bottom line we are at 84 with the current commits we can take 4 more or 3 if we get Lewis to transfer, if they take more than that someone is leaving the program that we dont know about. Or they pretty much know someone won't qualify
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top