BTN Analysts on Armstrong

I think the issue True was bringing up is that jmfb, through his wording, insinuated that Beck would be the head guy for Ohio State's offense, but that's just not the case. jmfb clarified himself though and I'm mostly in agreement with him. Tim Beck may not be the full on offensive coordinator at Ohio State, but, his knowledge is clearly valuable to Urban Meyer and his input will be as well.
Anyone with a pulse know beck will not be calling plays at OSU and I never insinuated he was the only guy on offense there or calling playsUrban is paying beck half a million a year to help architect and add wrinkles to the offense

becks signature will be all over the OSU offense

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's the thing about play-calling.

You practice all week. You scout the opponent. You see opportunities to exploit. You know the plays will work if the offense can execute.

And they can execute. Most of the time. Or maybe only half the time.

Or maybe in the pressure games when the entire team has the yips, they don't even execute a simple hand-off correctly.

So at what point do you NOT call the play? It may work well half the time, but you'll only hear about the half that didn't work. The defense is already waiting for your bread and butter plays. Everyone who seems to remember Ameer Abdullah getting six yards a carry forgets entire quarters or halves where he was getting jammed for one or two, and shut down on third and short.

Nebraska has had some outstanding playmakers at QB who could be equally frustrating decision-makers. Our offensive line hasn't been as bad as we sometimes think, but it hasn't been as good or cohesive as it needs to be. Mental mistakes, penalties and meltdowns were a hallmark of Bo Pelini's teams. Even modest improvement in mental discipline (teamwide - not just offense) and we're not questioning the play-calling.

At least not anymore than fans on any team, because questioning play calls is what we do best.
Not bad,I agree with most of itBut when you are calling plays there are several ways you can go

You can make adjustment tags to what you are running to make the base work

You can attack the defense away from where they have chosen to optimize to stop you

You have to know all your if thens

Then that isn't perfect either your playbook gets narrowed by personnel and game circumstances kids having an off day ,weather field position , how well the d is playing,etc

Double slants may be the best play to call against cover 2, but can your qb stay in the pocket and throw it and is your slot good enough to get off the los?

Most coaches will tell you 90%+ of games are won in the weeks leading up to the game

Not playcalling

I will add our play action game should have been good

Compared to where it should have been with our run threats

It was awful

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
I agree

Tommy has Brett favre syndrome

Tommy may be the luckiest qb in america I can't think of another qb who has seen more dB's drop sure interceptions and pic 6s
I've seen lots of college DBs do that over the years. I've even seen some of our best DBs drop sure INTs.

Every good college QB you watch has some sure INTs dropped by the DBs. That's why many of them are DBs instead of WRs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top