"overridden"So according to this deal, Iran can deny requests to inspect, which then has to be over rode by a board. I could be misunderstanding this, as I only am seeing an article, not the actually document. But that kind of sounds like it gives them some time to put stuff away until the coast is clear?
Fat chance of that happening.With Obamas promises about this great deal, if we find out that the terrorist who killed 4 marines today is linked or inspired by Isis, I fully expect that the Iranian leadership will come out and condemn Isis and killing Americans on behalf of Isis.
But....but....his administration said it is the most significant agreement in decades.Fat chance of that happening.With Obamas promises about this great deal, if we find out that the terrorist who killed 4 marines today is linked or inspired by Isis, I fully expect that the Iranian leadership will come out and condemn Isis and killing Americans on behalf of Isis.
You realize Iran has been fighting ISIS with boots on the ground for months, right?But....but....his administration said it is the most significant agreement in decades.Fat chance of that happening.With Obamas promises about this great deal, if we find out that the terrorist who killed 4 marines today is linked or inspired by Isis, I fully expect that the Iranian leadership will come out and condemn Isis and killing Americans on behalf of Isis.![]()
For starters, the Independent leans to the left on most political topics, so I would not identify that as being a strong source. WIth that said, I'm sure both sides have been at fault historically, but in the past 14 years, I have not heard Iran come forward once and condemn the 9/11 attacks, or any other attacks on Americans, whether its via Isis or Al Qaeda. There has been mounting evidence that they have contributed to the destabilization in Iraq since that war has begun, sending in their own fighters. Israel has always been a strong ally for the US (in the same way as Great Britain), and Iran's leader has called for the eradication of Israel. There have been marches and gathering as recently as a few months ago with hundreds of thousands chanting "Death to America." All of these behaviors do not make me have any faith or trust in the Iranian regime, but that must be where we disagree.You realize Iran has been fighting ISIS with boots on the ground for months, right?But....but....his administration said it is the most significant agreement in decades.Fat chance of that happening.With Obamas promises about this great deal, if we find out that the terrorist who killed 4 marines today is linked or inspired by Isis, I fully expect that the Iranian leadership will come out and condemn Isis and killing Americans on behalf of Isis.![]()
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/on-the-front-line-of-the-war-against-isis-joint-action-by-us-and-iran-has-never-felt-closer-10391625.html
I mean, this Iran hatred is fun and all, but it's completely misguided. It shows a complete lack of understanding of history, and the motivations of Iran and the US. Here's a tip - in this story, the US has mostly been the bad guy. Of the two, the country with the most reason to hate the other is Iran.
http://www.huskerboard.com/index.php?/topic/64360-wealth-inequality-in-america/?view=findpost&p=1556047For starters, the Independent leans to the left on most political topics, so I would not identify that as being a strong source.
I think you are missing the point. Iran has not had a history of being open and honest when it comes to weapons inspections, whether its through the US or UN. They have openly lead chants "Death to America" as well as the desire to eradicate Israel. Unless they have new leadership through fair elections, its complete naive to expect that their behaviors and intent will change. If Iran truly desires to be more accepted by the US and throughout the world, it will have to show more willingness to condemn Muslin extremists and terrorists both within Iran and in the region. They will understand that America is NOT a bad country who intends to do harm to others for no reason. For a century the US has used its resources to help promote peace throughout the world and make it a safer place. If Iran wanted to show goodwill, it would have released 4 prisoners it still holds as part of this deal, and the Obama administration should have made this part of the deal. That was a big mistake.Just refer to Obama's comments that echo your sentiments about Iran and its behaviors.
After that, you expect them to cozy up to America publicly? Without which this deal is a failure?
The point of the deal was to cut their pathway to a nuclear weapon. It was not to transform them instantly into a close ally, a subservient puppet state, or to effect a regime capitulation. None of those were options remotely on the table, and it's usually the case in diplomacy. Negotiation is not bulldozing the opponent into submission. It's getting a deal that both sides can accept.
You failed to also show that I pointed out the Huffington Post has also commented on how income inequality has gotten worse under the Obama administration. If you can provide some hard data points or trend lines showing its improved, or stabilized, please share with us all.http://www.huskerboard.com/index.php?/topic/64360-wealth-inequality-in-america/?view=findpost&p=1556047For starters, the Independent leans to the left on most political topics, so I would not identify that as being a strong source.