On what basis are we to make this vote?
If you strictly look at it from a football point of view, then no he should not have been fired. He was asked to make changes after the 02' season, and he did. He went from 7-7 to 10-3 which is quite an improvement. He was Big 12 coach of the year I believe 3 of his 6 years. He played for a NC.
Now if you look at it from the rumor mill point of view, then yes he probably should have been dismissed. According to my sources, he was engaged in an extramarital affair with a woman in the administration. Supposedly, Pud told him to stop or he would be dismissed. He did not stop the affair, and was fired. If you go on this basis, yeah it was proper to fire him. He'd been warned and did not heed the warnings, so he was fired.
A lot of people get on Solich for his recruiting. If the 3 mentioned in another thread do in fact go in the first round, I think it's easy to see that we had talent. There are quite a few Solich recruits playing on Sunday. In fact, he may have just as many or more than came off the NC years. I don't have the time to looke, but he has quite a few (Bullocks, Shanle, Washington, Pork Chop, Ruud, etc., etc.). The biggest problem he had was at QB. Jamal Lord was one hell of an athlete, but he wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He wasn't a very good QB. Joe Dailey didn't pan out. However, TO had a lot of QB's that weren't good either. Does Mickey Joseph, Mike Grant, Keithen McCants ring a bell. In order to run the option, you have to have a smart, tough, and athletic QB. We never became dominant until we had big, fast, tough QB's like Frazier, Frost, and Berringer. The receivers never really mattered because their main job was to block. The biggest waist of talent I ever saw was with a receiver from Omaha named Wilson Thomas (sp?). I always thought he waisted his college career coming to NU. I felt like he could have been a big time impact player at a passing school. A lot of our linemen were in state kids that were developed into linemen here (Zatecha's, Adam Treu, Joel Wilks). The defense was similar to this years. We typically had a good front 4. We typically had good linebackers. We usually had decent to good DB's. The reason for the meltdown year of 2002 stemmed from our offense being very ineffective. The defense pretty much played 3 of the 4 quarters. In 2003, the year was better with Lord having a year under his belt and a different Defensive Coordinator. 2004 would have been a down year I think, but I do believe we would have had a better record and went to a bowl game. Whether or not Dailey would have ever panned out or not as a good QB is hard to know. One thing we do know; he was not a drop back passer.