Brace yourselves

At this point, unless Riley lays an egg against Iowa (not likely), we're 6-6 and going bowling, with an outside shot at a winning season at 7-6. Riley is here another year...though I wouldn't be shocked if Banker and/or Langsdorf are demoted or find other positions...more Banker than Langsdorf.

As another poster pointed out elsewhere, Riley didn't even seem sure he wanted to name Banker as DC initially. I guess the hope would be that Banker would step down and be a position coach, and Riley would get a DC that agrees with what changes Banker started?
He is here another 3 years reguardless of the outcome of the Iowa game. Hopefully he retires here in ten years or so

 
Count 'Bility said:
And yet 5 plays from being 10-1 and this sh#t isnt even thought about

Fact
Yeah, it's unfortunate that this team with this much talent was in a situation where 5 of those games that should have been sound wins came down to a play here or there.

Also sad that the Purdue game is the "1"...a Purdue team that is truly awful.

 
1995 Redux said:
Can I unbrace myself yet?
braveheart-hold-original.jpg


 
Stumpy1 said:
These threads are stupid.
How stupid are they compared to threads/posts accusing Nate Gerry et. al. of deliberately sabotaging their teammates?Are they more, or less stupid?
Maybe if Gerry had put out more effort early on, we may have had a much better record.
Agreed. But that doesn't mean he was deliberately sabotaging his teammates as others have claimed

 
Eichorst should get Banker a HC job somewhere and make a power play for Bud Foster to replace him.
Foster is staying at VT.
Money talks, make it happen SE.
It's not a matter of money, it's a matter of Riley letting people go. Ain't gonna happen.
Eichorst can force his hand. He could push Banker into a low end HC job somehwere.

It likely wont happen, just wish we could go out and make a big hire like Foster to at least show we are patching the leaks.

 
Back
Top