Returning Starters

Mavric

Mavric

Yoda
Staff member
Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15
T3. Nebraska 14
T3. Penn State 14
T5. Indiana 13
T5. Michigan 13
T5. Minnesota 13
T5. Wisconsin 13
T9. Illinois 12
T9. Iowa 12
T9. Maryland 12
12. Northwestern 11
13. Michigan State 10
14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12
Wyoming 18
Oregon 11
Click to expand...
Link

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mavric said:
Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15
T3. Nebraska 14
T3. Penn State 14
T5. Indiana 13
T5. Michigan 13
T5. Minnesota 13
T5. Wisconsin 13
T9. Illinois 12
T9. Iowa 12
T9. Maryland 12
12. Northwestern 11
13. Michigan State 10
14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12
Wyoming 18
Oregon 11
Click to expand...
Link
Click to expand...
Besides DT the starters we have to replace won't take much

 
Mavric said:
Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15
T3. Nebraska 14
T3. Penn State 14
T5. Indiana 13
T5. Michigan 13
T5. Minnesota 13
T5. Wisconsin 13
T9. Illinois 12
T9. Iowa 12
T9. Maryland 12
12. Northwestern 11
13. Michigan State 10
14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12
Wyoming 18
Oregon 11
Click to expand...
Link
Click to expand...
Not sure if it's coincidental, or it means something. But that list is pretty close to an upside down ranking of the B1G.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Waterloohusker26 said:
Mavric said:
Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15
T3. Nebraska 14
T3. Penn State 14
T5. Indiana 13
T5. Michigan 13
T5. Minnesota 13
T5. Wisconsin 13
T9. Illinois 12
T9. Iowa 12
T9. Maryland 12
12. Northwestern 11
13. Michigan State 10
14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12
Wyoming 18
Oregon 11
Click to expand...
Link
Click to expand...
Besides DT the starters we have to replace won't take much
Click to expand...
I'm really liking the roster turnover this year. I'm sad we lost out on VV especially if firing our DL coach earlier would've kept him, but so it goes. I do like our up and coming line talent on both ends of the ball though.

 
Cross and Jano were given huge roles last year particularly compared to how the prior staff used them.......was that just a shot at the current staff? Otherwise it makes no sense,

MichiganDad3 said:
Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.
Click to expand...
 
Spooky Tooth said:
Cross and Jano were given huge roles last year particularly compared to how the prior staff used them.......was that just a shot at the current staff? Otherwise it makes no sense,

MichiganDad3 said:
Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
They were under utilized last year, but I agree that Jano was even more under utilized under Bo. It is tough to say Cross was under utilized under Bo because of AA.

 
MichiganDad3 said:
Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.
Click to expand...
Losing Jano will definitely hurt but I don't think losing Cross will be a big deal if Ozigbo and Newby stay healthy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lil' Red said:
MichiganDad3 said:
Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.
Click to expand...
Losing Jano will definitely hurt but I don't think losing Cross will be a big deal if Ozigbo and Newby stay healthy.
Click to expand...
I am excited by the potential of Ozigbo. I am not that impressed with Newby. I hope the OL is improved, and I wonder how much the backs will be hurt by not having Jano to plow the road.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Minnesota_husker said:
RedRedJarvisRedwine said:
Minnesota_husker said:
In Purdue's case, 16 people returning is probably not a good thing.
Click to expand...
Except.......ya know, they beat us and all that jazz.
Click to expand...
That doesnt make them good... We werent good either.

Beating Nebraska last year wasnt a quality win.
Click to expand...
Yes it was. Thanks to the residual effect of usually being decent. Now if we have 1 or 2 more seasons like that, then it wears off and we're just another win. I guarantee Iowa was happy to beat us, and so was every other team that beat us.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For Purdue, we could have only had 2-3 wins and beating us would be a quality win.

OSU??? No. Purdue??? yes.

 
BigRedBuster said:
For Purdue, we could have only had 2-3 wins and beating us would be a quality win.

OSU??? No. Purdue??? yes.
Click to expand...
Quality win doesnt change based on the team.

Just cause a 2 win team beats a 3 win team doesnt make that a quality win.

I dont think anyone should have considered beating Nebraska a quality win.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top