NevadaHusker27
Five-Star Recruit
This hire reminds me of a move USC made years ago when they hired Ken Norton Jr. as a assistant coach. Norton Jr. had only a few years of experience coaching in high school but was a solid hire for the program.
I think you're totally wrong. These kids dream of playing in the NFL and they want somebody to teach them the ways to get there.Having a lot of NFL experience essentially means nothing to high school recruits. DB is clueless in this regard, imo.
The things that make a great recruiter are good connections/relationships with high school coaches to get the "in", and then good people skills and sales pitch ability to close. Those can play out in very different ways, but, "Pay attention to me because I played in the NFL" doesn't really resonate.
Benning also tweeted Larry johnsons wiki page where the only experience he had before penn state picked him up for their dline was at a hs. Not saying it's a guaranteed great hire but it should be firmly in the wait and see category.You're right and wrong. The NFL tag does matter to lots of recruits. Now if that's all you have, youre right. But if you can add the NFL experience to the things you mentioned, you're going to be a star recruiter.Having a lot of NFL experience essentially means nothing to high school recruits. DB is clueless in this regard, imo.
The things that make a great recruiter are good connections/relationships with high school coaches to get the "in", and then good people skills and sales pitch ability to close. Those can play out in very different ways, but, "Pay attention to me because I played in the NFL" doesn't really resonate.
USC is a silver platter of talent. Any DL coach would excel there. This isn't a fair comparison either.This hire reminds me of a move USC made years ago when they hired Ken Norton Jr. as a assistant coach. Norton Jr. had only a few years of experience coaching in high school but was a solid hire for the program.
Exactly! I don't see how some are ready to throw in the towel. We've got a guy who helped pave the way for our historic 90's run. I like the hire. I think if given the time to coach and recruit, let's see what he has to offer. He could be the missing piece of the puzzle. Riley knows he needs to build his lines on both sides of the ball. I'm excited to see if the DL improves.Great hire! Excited about this one. Has experience and Husker ties, you can't argue with that one.
I think you have to hire a guy who "gets it." Parrella might be the guy who gets it, who understands Nebraska football and can preach it to current and prospective players. I'd say with Parrella having ties to our program, it's a plus. It might not be the sexy hire people want but he could be the guy we need. Like you, I'm in a wait and see mode which I think is FAIR. Coaches should always be judged on a performance basis of wins and losses on the football field and in college, that includes recruitment of players.Out of curiosity, would some people feel the same about this hire, or significantly less-thrilled, if he had zero Husker ties?
(Disclaimer: I don't hate or love the hire - just in a wait and see mode, and hoping he does great).
Frost told Riley who he wanted to be hired. That way they can retain him when Frost is named head coach in 2 years.Why Didn't Scott Frost get the Position?!?!?!This isn't the splash hire I was promised. Fire everybody!
USC is a silver platter of talent. Any DL coach would excel there. This isn't a fair comparison either.This hire reminds me of a move USC made years ago when they hired Ken Norton Jr. as a assistant coach. Norton Jr. had only a few years of experience coaching in high school but was a solid hire for the program.
I think the reasons you stated are the reasons hes no longer here. Had Hughes got VV to stay & pulled in a good recurit or two we would probably not be having this conversation.I'm in the wait and see on the hire (I can see the upside though), but I don't think he can be any worse than Hughes. My only wish was that we had pulled the trigger earlier, and perhaps had kept VV and maybe landed a DT in the class.
I like the fact he is a former Blackshirt. He gets "it". He won't let the kids take plays off, go half speed or not understand the relentless motor it takes to succeed. Playing at such a high level at both college and the NFL shows he has the physical skills needed to succeed. He also mentions speaking to McBride and the DL coach at the Rams for whats happening in football (changes/schemes) and says he's always learning. Not afraid to seek answers or help. Another plus.I think you have to hire a guy who "gets it." Parrella might be the guy who gets it, who understands Nebraska football and can preach it to current and prospective players. I'd say with Parrella having ties to our program, it's a plus. It might not be the sexy hire people want but he could be the guy we need. Like you, I'm in a wait and see mode which I think is FAIR. Coaches should always be judged on a performance basis of wins and losses on the football field and in college, that includes recruitment of players.Out of curiosity, would some people feel the same about this hire, or significantly less-thrilled, if he had zero Husker ties?
(Disclaimer: I don't hate or love the hire - just in a wait and see mode, and hoping he does great).