Out of curiosity, would some people feel the same about this hire, or significantly less-thrilled, if he had zero Husker ties?
(Disclaimer: I don't hate or love the hire - just in a wait and see mode, and hoping he does great).
I think you have to hire a guy who "gets it." Parrella might be the guy who gets it, who understands Nebraska football and can preach it to current and prospective players. I'd say with Parrella having ties to our program, it's a plus. It might not be the sexy hire people want but he could be the guy we need. Like you, I'm in a wait and see mode which I think is FAIR. Coaches should always be judged on a performance basis of wins and losses on the football field and in college, that includes recruitment of players.
That's fair, and I too think the Husker ties are a plus. I just don't put as much stock into them as some other people do, I think.
For me, having Husker/Nebraska ties can be a factor that puts one coach over the edge of another candidate if all things are relatively equal. It is not, however, a significant determining factor. It seems some people are really excited simply because he's a Husker, and I would just urge people to look beyond that. Don't let that be the difference between whether or not we think this is a good hire, which it appears is happening to a degree.
I think it's a benefit he has a Husker background but it certainly is not weighing very heavily into my initial evaluation of him.